Profiles, repos, scores & roasts
manim
You started with a project for making mathematical animations and somehow ended up maintaining the software equivalent of a small civilization. The name says “manim”; the timeline says “congratulations, you now run a graphics ecosystem.”
videos
Most people make videos; this repository suggests you also built the conveyor belt, quality-control station, and mysterious blinking control panel behind them. At this point, the content pipeline has content pipelines.
Repository binding unavailable
A dedicated captioning repository is a wonderfully specific declaration that even punctuation gets production infrastructure. Somewhere, a subtitle is waiting for its own deployment ceremony.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
The portfolio includes a project whose name sounds like the backstage clipboard nobody applauds—until it disappears and the entire show falls apart. Glamour is temporary; caption operations are forever.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
Among the grand animation and publishing machinery sits a compact site experiment from an earlier era, like finding a charming hand-cranked appliance in a room full of launch systems. Small project, enormous historical vibes.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Impact
25% weight
The portfolio is centered on a major Python project alongside video production and publishing infrastructure, indicating unusually ambitious and coherent public work.
Consistency
15% weight
The profile shows long-term activity since 2015, with several first-party repositories updated in 2026 and additional maintained work across earlier years.
Quality
25% weight
Multiple non-fork repositories are active and organized around distinct production concerns; the metadata supports strong maturity signals, though implementation quality cannot be assessed without source-level evidence.
Depth
20% weight
The flagship repository, production tooling, and related publishing projects indicate sustained ownership across a substantial ecosystem over many years.
Breadth
10% weight
The portfolio spans Python, MDX, TypeScript, JavaScript, and Shell, with software, web, video, captioning, and operational projects represented.
Community
5% weight
The supplied metadata shows exceptionally strong community reach and substantial repository interest; this is used only as a weak positive tie-breaker, not as evidence for other categories.
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Non-fork sample
6
Last 12 months
206
Accepted fact
41126
Profile date
Mar 2015
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
3b1b /
97/100
A long-maintained, non-fork Python project with very substantial public interest and a central role in the portfolio.
3b1b /
88/100
A substantial non-fork Python repository focused on video-related work, updated recently and closely aligned with the portfolio's core theme.
3b1b /
75/100
An active, non-fork MDX website project that supports the portfolio's public-facing publishing infrastructure.
3b1b /
62/100
A TypeScript captioning project with evidence of real ownership and maintenance, though its last listed update is older than the main projects.
3b1b /
58/100
A non-fork Python operations-oriented project updated recently, suggesting active support work around the broader production workflow.
3b1b /
38/100
An older forked JavaScript project with modest scope signals and no recent listed update.
3b1b /
35/100
A small, older forked project related to video experimentation, with limited evidence of current ownership in the supplied metadata.
3b1b /
34/100
A small, older non-fork Shell project that appears to be a compact site or deployment experiment rather than a major portfolio pillar.
3b1b /
32/100
An older forked project with limited metadata evidence of current maintenance or distinctive ownership.
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 96 | 24.00 |
| Quality | 25% | 78 | 19.50 |
| Depth | 20% | 94 | 18.80 |
| Consistency | 15% | 91 | 13.65 |
| Breadth | 10% | 67 | 6.70 |
| Community | 5% | 99 | 4.95 |
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for 3b1b. The portfolio is centered on a major Python project alongside video production and publishing infrastructure, indicating unusually ambitious and coherent public work.
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for 3b1b. Multiple non-fork repositories are active and organized around distinct production concerns; the metadata supports strong maturity signals, though implementation quality cannot be assessed without source-level evidence.
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for 3b1b. The flagship repository, production tooling, and related publishing projects indicate sustained ownership across a substantial ecosystem over many years.
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for 3b1b. The profile shows long-term activity since 2015, with several first-party repositories updated in 2026 and additional maintained work across earlier years.
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for 3b1b. The portfolio spans Python, MDX, TypeScript, JavaScript, and Shell, with software, web, video, captioning, and operational projects represented.
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for 3b1b. The supplied metadata shows exceptionally strong community reach and substantial repository interest; this is used only as a weak positive tie-breaker, not as evidence for other categories.
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3
