Profiles, repos, scores & roasts
Repository binding unavailable
NSURLCache testing is the kind of project that asks the internet to remember things, then immediately opens a test case to verify it remembered correctly.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
With an API-shaped name and an unknown language, this fork has achieved the rare architectural style of being mysterious at both the entrance and the exit.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
A photo browser is an ambitious way to make scrolling through images sound like a product launch; this one feels like it packed its bags for a long trip around the early mobile era.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
Put the cache tester beside the photo browser and the API fork, and the portfolio becomes a charming expedition through old-school app plumbing, visual browsing, and one unidentified detour.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Impact
25% weight
The portfolio contains a small Objective-C utility and a forked API-related repository, indicating some practical intent but limited evidence of distinctive scope or broad usefulness.
Consistency
15% weight
The supplied repositories were last updated between 2010 and 2014, with no newer activity shown; this supports limited evidence of sustained recent maintenance.
Quality
25% weight
Metadata shows two Objective-C repositories and one repository with unknown language; fork status and age provide only modest maturity signals, with no source, tests, CI, or documentation available for assessment.
Depth
20% weight
There is evidence of several repositories, but the available metadata indicates old activity and includes two forks, providing limited evidence of sustained original ownership or long-term project development.
Breadth
10% weight
The visible languages and project types show little demonstrated variety: two Objective-C repositories and one repository with unknown language, including two forks.
Community
5% weight
Follower and star data are limited but are treated only as a neutral-to-weak tie-breaker; unavailable community evidence does not reduce the score.
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Non-fork sample
1
Last 12 months
0
Accepted fact
26
Profile date
Apr 2009
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
abhinittiwari-zz /
31/100
An archived-in-age but not flagged archived Objective-C repository focused on NSURL cache testing, with a concrete technical premise and limited metadata evidence of later maintenance.
abhinittiwari-zz /
22/100
A forked Objective-C photo-browser repository, suggesting a recognizable application component, though the available metadata offers limited evidence of original ownership or continued development.
abhinittiwari-zz /
20/100
A forked repository with an API-oriented name and unknown language; its purpose is identifiable at a high level, but the supplied metadata does not establish original scope or implementation maturity.
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 24 | 6.00 |
| Quality | 25% | 24 | 6.00 |
| Depth | 20% | 20 | 4.00 |
| Consistency | 15% | 18 | 2.70 |
| Breadth | 10% | 19 | 1.90 |
| Community | 5% | 50 | 2.50 |
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for abhinittiwari-zz. The portfolio contains a small Objective-C utility and a forked API-related repository, indicating some practical intent but limited evidence of distinctive scope or broad usefulness.
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for abhinittiwari-zz. Metadata shows two Objective-C repositories and one repository with unknown language; fork status and age provide only modest maturity signals, with no source, tests, CI, or documentation available for assessment.
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for abhinittiwari-zz. There is evidence of several repositories, but the available metadata indicates old activity and includes two forks, providing limited evidence of sustained original ownership or long-term project development.
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for abhinittiwari-zz. The supplied repositories were last updated between 2010 and 2014, with no newer activity shown; this supports limited evidence of sustained recent maintenance.
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for abhinittiwari-zz. The visible languages and project types show little demonstrated variety: two Objective-C repositories and one repository with unknown language, including two forks.
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for abhinittiwari-zz. Follower and star data are limited but are treated only as a neutral-to-weak tie-breaker; unavailable community evidence does not reduce the score.
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3
