Profiles, repos, scores & roasts
#16 · Top 98.5%
Affaan Mustafa
The Agentic Exchange for Compute @Ito-Markets | B={(eᵢ,wᵢ)}; Vᴮ=Σᵢwᵢℙα(eᵢ=1) | OSS meta-harness for AI agents @ECC-Tools
Ship machine
silver medal
Overall
0.0/ 100
Repository binding unavailable
ECC has the kind of three-letter name that makes a repository sound like either a cryptography breakthrough or a very confident internal meeting. With this much apparent reach, the mystery is practically a feature.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
agentshield
AgentShield sounds like it arrived wearing a tiny tactical vest to stop autonomous assistants from touching the production database. The premise is wonderfully specific and appropriately nervous.
claude-swarm
Claude Swarm takes the classic strategy of asking one assistant for help and scales it into an entire workplace sitcom. At least the agents can presumably delegate the delegation.
stoictradingai
StoicTradingAI is trying to combine emotional discipline, markets, and artificial intelligence—the exact meeting where everyone says volatility is a mindset. Its archived status gives the premise a particularly philosophical ending.
Repository binding unavailable
Quranic Arabic recognition is a wonderfully specialized collision of linguistics and machine learning: even the model gets homework, and the vocabulary list is probably more serious than the average chatbot prompt.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Impact
25% weight
The portfolio includes unusually ambitious projects spanning security, agent orchestration, algorithmic scoring, trading, commerce, and developer tooling. The available metadata supports strong ambition and apparent usefulness, while not by
Consistency
15% weight
The supplied repositories show substantial recent activity across most projects, with several pushed in 2026 and a smaller set from 2025. One project is archived, but the overall pattern indicates sustained ownership.
Quality
25% weight
Non-fork ownership, active status for nearly all listed repositories, substantial project variety, and continued updates are positive maturity signals. Source-level engineering quality cannot be assessed from the supplied evidence.
Depth
20% weight
Several distinct, non-fork projects have sustained recent updates and substantial apparent scope. The number of active projects suggests meaningful ownership, though implementation depth and maintenance details are unavailable.
Breadth
10% weight
The portfolio spans JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, and Jupyter Notebook, with projects covering security, AI agents, research, trading, commerce, and language recognition.
Community
5% weight
Community evidence is a weak positive signal: the profile has many followers and several repositories have notable star counts. Popularity is not used to raise the other categories.
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Non-fork sample
11
Last 12 months
1882
Accepted fact
9075
Profile date
Feb 2023
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
affaan-m /
94/100
A highly visible, actively updated JavaScript project with unusually large apparent reach; its name suggests a focused developer or security-oriented toolkit, though implementation details are unavailable.
affaan-m /
86/100
An actively maintained TypeScript security project with strong apparent reach and a distinctive agent-safety premise.
affaan-m /
78/100
An actively updated Python project focused on coordinating Claude agents, indicating substantial orchestration ambition.
affaan-m /
76/100
An actively maintained Python project with an assistant-like premise and notable apparent interest, indicating ambitious automation or AI-oriented scope.
affaan-m /
68/100
A TypeScript AI trading project with meaningful apparent ambition, but its archived status limits evidence of ongoing maintenance.
affaan-m /
65/100
An actively updated TypeScript project centered on algorithmic scoring, suggesting a focused technical utility with developing scope.
affaan-m /
62/100
An actively updated profile or hub repository with notable apparent interest; the supplied metadata does not reveal its substantive project scope.
affaan-m /
58/100
A non-fork Python project with a distinctive name and evidence of sustained ownership, though its scope and current activity appear more limited than the newer projects.
affaan-m /
54/100
A non-fork commerce-oriented project with a clear applied premise and evidence of ownership, though recent maintenance appears limited.
affaan-m /
52/100
An actively updated Jupyter Notebook project applying deep learning to Quranic Arabic recognition, adding a specialized research dimension to the portfolio.
affaan-m /
51/100
An actively updated Python economics research project, representing credible applied analytical work with a narrower apparent scope.
affaan-m /
35/100
A forked repository with recent activity; ownership and originality are less clear from the supplied metadata.
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 91 | 22.75 |
| Quality | 25% | 72 | 18.00 |
| Depth | 20% | 82 | 16.40 |
| Consistency | 15% | 78 | 11.70 |
| Breadth | 10% | 83 | 8.30 |
| Community | 5% | 68 | 3.40 |
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for affaan-m. The portfolio includes unusually ambitious projects spanning security, agent orchestration, algorithmic scoring, trading, commerce, and developer tooling. The available metadata supports strong ambition and apparent usefulness, while not by
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for affaan-m. Non-fork ownership, active status for nearly all listed repositories, substantial project variety, and continued updates are positive maturity signals. Source-level engineering quality cannot be assessed from the supplied evidence.
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for affaan-m. Several distinct, non-fork projects have sustained recent updates and substantial apparent scope. The number of active projects suggests meaningful ownership, though implementation depth and maintenance details are unavailable.
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for affaan-m. The supplied repositories show substantial recent activity across most projects, with several pushed in 2026 and a smaller set from 2025. One project is archived, but the overall pattern indicates sustained ownership.
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for affaan-m. The portfolio spans JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, and Jupyter Notebook, with projects covering security, AI agents, research, trading, commerce, and language recognition.
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for affaan-m. Community evidence is a weak positive signal: the profile has many followers and several repositories have notable star counts. Popularity is not used to raise the other categories.
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3