Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
alextheanalyst GitHub avatar

#33 · Top 96.9%

alextheanalyst

Alex The Analyst

Helping you become a Data Analyst one code at a time. All code for Youtube Channel Alex The Analyst.

B

Solid engineer

bronze medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

alextheanalyst category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

82A

The portfolio is coherent around practical data analytics education and projects spanning SQL, spreadsheets, Python, notebooks, Power BI, Databricks, and Snowflake.

Consistency

15% weight

78B

The visible repositories show repeated updates from 2022 through 2026, with many instructional and portfolio projects maintained into 2024-2026.

Quality

25% weight

66C

Repository names, non-fork status, active flags, and sustained organization provide positive maturity signals, though source code, tests, documentation, and implementation quality are unavailable.

Depth

20% weight

72B

Multiple series, a bootcamp certification repository, and a substantial portfolio-projects repository indicate sustained ownership and meaningful scope, while implementation depth cannot be verified from metadata alone.

Breadth

10% weight

76B

The listed work covers TSQL, Jupyter notebooks, spreadsheet-oriented material, databases, business intelligence, Python, and multiple data-platform ecosystems.

Community

5% weight

86A

The profile has substantial follower and repository-star signals, which provide a positive tie-breaker for visible reach without being used to inflate the other categories.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

8 active days

Language distribution

  • Unknown50%
  • Jupyter Notebook42%
  • TSQL8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

12

Commits

Last 12 months

19

Followers

Accepted fact

22737

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Jan 2020

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created alextheanalyst/sql-code - All SQL Code or Documents from AlexTheAnalyst YouTube videos
  3. Created alextheanalyst/alextheanalyst - All documents from AlexTheAnalyst YouTube videos
  4. Created alextheanalyst/pythoncode
  5. Created alextheanalyst/portfolioprojects
  6. Created alextheanalyst/excel-tutorial
  7. Created alextheanalyst/power-bi
  8. Created alextheanalyst/pythonyoutubeseries
  9. Created alextheanalyst/pandasyoutubeseries
  10. Created alextheanalyst/data-analytics-bootcamp-certification
  11. Created alextheanalyst/mysql-youtube-series
  12. Created alextheanalyst/databricksseries
  13. Created alextheanalyst/snowflakecourse
  14. Most recent push to alextheanalyst/data-analytics-bootcamp-certification

Compare

ALEXTHEANALYST · 6DMEDIAN CODER

ALEXTHEANALYST compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%8220.50
Quality25%6616.50
Depth20%7214.40
Consistency15%7811.70
Breadth10%767.60
Community5%864.30
Impact · 82/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for alextheanalyst. The portfolio is coherent around practical data analytics education and projects spanning SQL, spreadsheets, Python, notebooks, Power BI, Databricks, and Snowflake.

Quality · 66/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for alextheanalyst. Repository names, non-fork status, active flags, and sustained organization provide positive maturity signals, though source code, tests, documentation, and implementation quality are unavailable.

Depth · 72/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for alextheanalyst. Multiple series, a bootcamp certification repository, and a substantial portfolio-projects repository indicate sustained ownership and meaningful scope, while implementation depth cannot be verified from metadata alone.

Consistency · 78/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for alextheanalyst. The visible repositories show repeated updates from 2022 through 2026, with many instructional and portfolio projects maintained into 2024-2026.

Breadth · 76/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for alextheanalyst. The listed work covers TSQL, Jupyter notebooks, spreadsheet-oriented material, databases, business intelligence, Python, and multiple data-platform ecosystems.

Community · 86/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for alextheanalyst. The profile has substantial follower and repository-star signals, which provide a positive tie-breaker for visible reach without being used to inflate the other categories.

Raw total
75.00
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
75.0

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 9, 2026, 5:54 AM UTC and is marked aging.