Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
autoantohaki GitHub avatar

#1092 · Top 0.3%

autoantohaki

F

GitHub tourist

red alert

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Repository binding unavailable

The One-Repo Orchestra

One repository, unknown language, and a recent push: it is less a portfolio than a one-instrument band currently tuning backstage.

Historical result · no repository binding was retained

Repository binding unavailable

Mystery Stack

Calling the language unknown gives this project the rare ability to be polyglot, minimalist, and technically mysterious all at once.

Historical result · no repository binding was retained

Repository binding unavailable

Fresh Paint Energy

The recent activity suggests the sign is still being painted; visitors can tell someone is working, even if the storefront’s purpose remains delightfully undisclosed.

Historical result · no repository binding was retained

Category breakdown

autoantohaki category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

15F

One repository with no stated language or project description provides little evidence for usefulness, ambition, originality, or coherent project scope.

Consistency

15% weight

20F

The available metadata shows one public repository and a recent push, but provides too little history to establish a sustained contribution pattern.

Quality

25% weight

20F

The supplied metadata does not expose implementation, testing, documentation, or other engineering-maturity signals; the low score reflects limited evidence rather than a claim of defects.

Depth

20% weight

15F

A single repository and the absence of scope, release, or maintenance details provide limited evidence of sustained ownership or substantial depth.

Breadth

10% weight

10F

Only one repository is listed and its language is unknown, so meaningful language or project-type variety cannot be demonstrated.

Community

5% weight

50D

Community evidence is unavailable beyond a follower count and zero stars; popularity is not used to lower this score, so this remains a neutral tie-breaker.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

181 active days

Language distribution

  • Unknown100%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

1

Commits

Last 12 months

6

Followers

Accepted fact

22

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Jan 2025

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created autoantohaki/autoantohaki
  3. Most recent push to autoantohaki/autoantohaki

Compare

AUTOANTOHAKI · 6DMEDIAN CODER

AUTOANTOHAKI compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%153.75
Quality25%205.00
Depth20%153.00
Consistency15%203.00
Breadth10%101.00
Community5%502.50
Impact · 15/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for autoantohaki. One repository with no stated language or project description provides little evidence for usefulness, ambition, originality, or coherent project scope.

Quality · 20/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for autoantohaki. The supplied metadata does not expose implementation, testing, documentation, or other engineering-maturity signals; the low score reflects limited evidence rather than a claim of defects.

Depth · 15/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for autoantohaki. A single repository and the absence of scope, release, or maintenance details provide limited evidence of sustained ownership or substantial depth.

Consistency · 20/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for autoantohaki. The available metadata shows one public repository and a recent push, but provides too little history to establish a sustained contribution pattern.

Breadth · 10/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for autoantohaki. Only one repository is listed and its language is unknown, so meaningful language or project-type variety cannot be demonstrated.

Community · 50/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for autoantohaki. Community evidence is unavailable beyond a follower count and zero stars; popularity is not used to lower this score, so this remains a neutral tie-breaker.

Raw total
18.25
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
18.3

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 9, 2026, 6:11 AM UTC and is marked aging.