Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
cameloo1 GitHub avatar

#296 · Top 72.6%

cameloo1

Wasif Amin

CS | AI | Data Science | Finance | Love working on cutting-edge things

C

Getting there

green room

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

cameloo1 category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

67C

The portfolio centers on ambitious, contemporary problems including SIEM work, inference autoscaling, conversational notifications, code graphs, agent tooling, and research. The premises appear potentially useful and coherent around AI and8

Consistency

15% weight

78B

The supplied repositories show a dense and unusually recent activity pattern, with all listed projects updated between May and August 2026. The evidence supports strong recent consistency, though it does not establish long-term maintenance.

Quality

25% weight

54D

Repository metadata indicates substantial technical variety and several nontrivial project themes, but no source, tests, CI, documentation, or implementation evidence is available to verify engineering maturity.

Depth

20% weight

61C

Twelve active-looking repositories and projects such as free-inference-autoscaler, relaybase, codegraph-mcp, and machine-learning-projects suggest meaningful ownership and scope. However, metadata alone cannot establish completeness or long

Breadth

10% weight

75B

The listed work spans Python, HTML, TypeScript, JavaScript, Rust, and repositories with unknown detected languages, alongside security, machine learning, infrastructure, developer tooling, and research themes.

Community

5% weight

50D

Community evidence is limited: the supplied profile has four followers and the listed repositories have at most one star. Under the rubric, this is neutral rather than a penalty.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

93 active days

Language distribution

  • Python25%
  • JavaScript17%
  • Rust17%
  • TypeScript17%
  • Unknown16%
  • HTML8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

12

Commits

Last 12 months

399

Followers

Accepted fact

4

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Oct 2023

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created cameloo1/siem-lab
  3. Created cameloo1/machine-learning-projects - A collection of machine learning models and projects that increase in complexity and difficulty. Mainly to sharpen machine learning and quantitive finance skills, as well as build a portfolio of
  4. Created cameloo1/relaybase - Manage multiple local dev servers from one place. Includes a dedicated lightweight agent and MCP controls for AI agents
  5. Created cameloo1/codegraph-mcp - Local repo intelligence layer for AI coding agents. Indexes code into typed graphs, returns proof-labeled context packets, keeps changed files fresh, and validates edits with linter-style blockers, warnings,
  6. Created cameloo1/scaleless
  7. Created cameloo1/cameloo1
  8. Created cameloo1/agentic-research-lab - Codex-based research lab with custom dedicated quant, ml, and business modeling tools, with smart data processing and storage and cost management.
  9. Created cameloo1/conversational-notifications - Get conversational status updates on agent activity — and talk back. On-device TTS announces, you reply by voice, and a dedicated agent answers with real thread, log, and repo context, or rela
  10. Created cameloo1/dbn-bookcheck - Reconstruct the ES order book from DBN market-by-order data and prove it against the exchange's own MBP-10 feed.
  11. Created cameloo1/agent-friendly - A dedicated agent-readiness SEO scanner for your website. Wraps Cloudflare's isitagentready into an on-device MCP.
  12. Created cameloo1/dfri - DFRI estimates the share of covered companies' U.S. consumer revenue funded by new consumer credit. It also predicts each month's change in U.S. consumer borrowing before the Federal Reserve publishes the official G.
  13. Created cameloo1/free-inference-autoscaler - Lets you use free models from OpenRouter and NVIDIA. Checks a route is actually free before each call, keeps background jobs from eating the quota your users need, and backs off when a provider r
  14. Most recent push to cameloo1/cameloo1

Compare

CAMELOO1 · 6DMEDIAN CODER

CAMELOO1 compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%6716.75
Quality25%5413.50
Depth20%6112.20
Consistency15%7811.70
Breadth10%757.50
Community5%502.50
Impact · 67/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for cameloo1. The portfolio centers on ambitious, contemporary problems including SIEM work, inference autoscaling, conversational notifications, code graphs, agent tooling, and research. The premises appear potentially useful and coherent around AI and8

Quality · 54/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for cameloo1. Repository metadata indicates substantial technical variety and several nontrivial project themes, but no source, tests, CI, documentation, or implementation evidence is available to verify engineering maturity.

Depth · 61/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for cameloo1. Twelve active-looking repositories and projects such as free-inference-autoscaler, relaybase, codegraph-mcp, and machine-learning-projects suggest meaningful ownership and scope. However, metadata alone cannot establish completeness or long

Consistency · 78/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for cameloo1. The supplied repositories show a dense and unusually recent activity pattern, with all listed projects updated between May and August 2026. The evidence supports strong recent consistency, though it does not establish long-term maintenance.

Breadth · 75/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for cameloo1. The listed work spans Python, HTML, TypeScript, JavaScript, Rust, and repositories with unknown detected languages, alongside security, machine learning, infrastructure, developer tooling, and research themes.

Community · 50/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for cameloo1. Community evidence is limited: the supplied profile has four followers and the listed repositories have at most one star. Under the rubric, this is neutral rather than a penalty.

Raw total
64.15
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
64.2

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 9, 2026, 6:22 AM UTC and is marked aging.