ses-cloud
Cloud with a small forecast
ses-cloud reaches for the sky, but its available footprint is still more promising weather report than full meteorological system.
Roasts
ict3204
Forklift fundamentals
ict3204 brings Shell to the portfolio via fork: a practical way to move code around, even if the ownership story is riding in the passenger seat.
ses-cloud
HTML altitude
An HTML project named ses-cloud is an admirably compact launch plan: the branding is airborne, while the visible evidence is still waiting on its boarding pass.
Repository binding unavailable
Two projects, one terminal
Between a cloud-themed HTML project and a Shell fork, this portfolio has the beginnings of a tech weather station—part sky, part command line, and still collecting readings.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Category breakdown
Impact
25% weight
The repository names suggest a cloud-related project and an academic or coursework-oriented project, but metadata alone does not establish usefulness, ambition, or originality beyond a developing portfolio.
Consistency
15% weight
Two public repositories show activity across 2022 and 2024, but the small portfolio provides limited evidence of sustained contribution patterns.
Quality
25% weight
One repository is an unarchived HTML project and the other is a Shell-language fork; the available metadata offers only thin signals about engineering maturity.
Depth
20% weight
The unarchived 2024 project suggests some ownership, while the forked 2022 repository and small repository count provide limited evidence of sustained scope or maintenance.
Breadth
10% weight
The portfolio spans HTML and Shell and includes a non-fork project plus a fork, indicating modest language and project-type variety.
Community
5% weight
No follower or star signal is available beyond zero counts, which are neutral under the rubric; community evidence is therefore treated as neutral.
Stats
52-week commit heatmap
0 active daysLanguage distribution
2 langs
- HTML50%
- Shell50%
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Numbers
Owned repos
Non-fork sample
1
Commits
Last 12 months
0
Followers
Accepted fact
0
Joined GitHub
Profile date
Oct 2016
Top repos
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
dominicng /
ses-cloud
42/100
ses-cloud is an owned, unarchived HTML repository with activity through March 2024, providing credible but limited metadata evidence of a developing cloud-oriented project.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingHTML
★ 0 · 2y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
dominicng /
ict3204
25/100
ict3204 is a Shell-language fork last pushed in October 2022; it demonstrates participation in a technical project but offers limited metadata evidence of original ownership or ongoing maintenance.
ForkActiveProfile ratingShell
★ 0 · 4y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
Timeline
- Joined GitHub
- Created dominicng/ict3204
- Created dominicng/ses-cloud
- Most recent push to dominicng/ses-cloud
Compare
DOMINICNG · 6DMEDIAN CODER
Rubric
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 35 | 8.75 |
| Quality | 25% | 34 | 8.50 |
| Depth | 20% | 30 | 6.00 |
| Consistency | 15% | 32 | 4.80 |
| Breadth | 10% | 38 | 3.80 |
| Community | 5% | 50 | 2.50 |
Impact · 35/100
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for dominicng. The repository names suggest a cloud-related project and an academic or coursework-oriented project, but metadata alone does not establish usefulness, ambition, or originality beyond a developing portfolio.
Quality · 34/100
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for dominicng. One repository is an unarchived HTML project and the other is a Shell-language fork; the available metadata offers only thin signals about engineering maturity.
Depth · 30/100
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for dominicng. The unarchived 2024 project suggests some ownership, while the forked 2022 repository and small repository count provide limited evidence of sustained scope or maintenance.
Consistency · 32/100
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for dominicng. Two public repositories show activity across 2022 and 2024, but the small portfolio provides limited evidence of sustained contribution patterns.
Breadth · 38/100
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for dominicng. The portfolio spans HTML and Shell and includes a non-fork project plus a fork, indicating modest language and project-type variety.
Community · 50/100
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for dominicng. No follower or star signal is available beyond zero counts, which are neutral under the rubric; community evidence is therefore treated as neutral.
- Raw total
- 34.35
- Top-end curve
- +0.00
- Final overall
- 34.4
Tier thresholds
S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist
I. How this saved profile rating was produced
- 01
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
- 02
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
- 03
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
- 04
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
- 05
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3
II. Data sources & caveats
- Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
- Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
- Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
- Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
- Analysis completed Aug 9, 2026, 9:01 PM UTC and is marked aging.