Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
f GitHub avatar

#4 · Top 99.6%

f

Fatih Kadir Akın

Developer Advocate at @WordPress, @Automattic — Building prompts.chat — JavaScript Developer. AI Enthusiast. Author. — @GitHub Star.

A

Ship machine

silver medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

f category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

93S

The portfolio includes projects with substantial apparent usefulness and ambition, including a widely starred prompt-focused project, a Swift application, commit-history tooling, MCP tooling, and analytics work. Popularity is not used as a,

Consistency

15% weight

94S

The supplied repositories show unusually recent activity across many projects, with dates concentrated in 2026 and one substantial project updated in late 2025; the long account history and 305 public repositories support sustained output.

Quality

25% weight

79B

The supplied metadata indicates active ownership, a mix of non-fork and forked projects, and varied project scope. The available metadata does not provide enough information to assess engineering maturity directly.

Depth

20% weight

91S

The account shows a large body of public work and several projects with meaningful apparent scope and sustained recent activity. Multiple repositories have accumulated substantial interest, while the metadata does not establish internal or

Breadth

10% weight

88A

The listed work spans TypeScript, Ruby, Python, Swift, HTML, JavaScript, and Go, covering developer tooling, mobile software, web projects, prompt resources, analytics, and utilities.

Community

5% weight

97S

The profile has a large follower count and several repositories with substantial stars, indicating strong external visibility. This is used only as a weak community signal and does not raise the other category scores.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

285 active days

Language distribution

  • JavaScript34%
  • TypeScript17%
  • Go9%
  • HTML8%
  • Python8%
  • Ruby8%
  • Swift8%
  • Unknown8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

11

Commits

Last 12 months

2333

Followers

Accepted fact

11279

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Feb 2010

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created f/prompts.chat - f.k.a. Awesome ChatGPT Prompts. Share, discover, and collect prompts from the community. Free and open source — self-host for your organization with complete privacy.
  3. Created f/mcptools - A command-line interface for interacting with MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers using both stdio and HTTP transport.
  4. Created f/git-rewrite-commits - AI-powered git commit message rewriter using Ollama or GPT
  5. Created f/homebrew-textream - Homebrew for Textream
  6. Created f/textream - Textream is a free macOS teleprompter app for streamers, interviewers, and presenters. It highlights your script in real-time as you speak, displayed in a beautiful Dynamic Island overlay. With extensible features.
  7. Created f/agentlytics - Comprehensive analytics dashboard for AI coding agents — Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, VS Code Copilot, Zed, Antigravity, OpenCode, Command Code
  8. Created f/appetit - Appétit — An App Store-inspired catalog of free, tiny apps built with agentic engineering and vibecoding. Bon appétit for apps.
  9. Created f/wvw.dev - The distributed app store for vibe-coded projects. Federated, AI-curated, fully static on GitHub Pages.
  10. Created f/ai-prompt - A Gutenberg block that renders interactive AI prompts inline. No iframe required.
  11. Created f/awesome-deeplinks - Hidden Deeplinks of Applications
  12. Created f/101calculator - Camera-based 101 Okey per calculator
  13. Created f/homebrew-cask - 🍻 Default casks (upstream binary packages) for the package manager for everywhere
  14. Most recent push to f/homebrew-textream

Compare

F · 6DMEDIAN CODER

F compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%9323.25
Quality25%7919.75
Depth20%9118.20
Consistency15%9414.10
Breadth10%888.80
Community5%974.85
Impact · 93/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for f. The portfolio includes projects with substantial apparent usefulness and ambition, including a widely starred prompt-focused project, a Swift application, commit-history tooling, MCP tooling, and analytics work. Popularity is not used as a,

Quality · 79/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for f. The supplied metadata indicates active ownership, a mix of non-fork and forked projects, and varied project scope. The available metadata does not provide enough information to assess engineering maturity directly.

Depth · 91/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for f. The account shows a large body of public work and several projects with meaningful apparent scope and sustained recent activity. Multiple repositories have accumulated substantial interest, while the metadata does not establish internal or

Consistency · 94/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for f. The supplied repositories show unusually recent activity across many projects, with dates concentrated in 2026 and one substantial project updated in late 2025; the long account history and 305 public repositories support sustained output.

Breadth · 88/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for f. The listed work spans TypeScript, Ruby, Python, Swift, HTML, JavaScript, and Go, covering developer tooling, mobile software, web projects, prompt resources, analytics, and utilities.

Community · 97/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for f. The profile has a large follower count and several repositories with substantial stars, indicating strong external visibility. This is used only as a weak community signal and does not raise the other category scores.

Raw total
88.95
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
88.9

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 9, 2026, 9:07 PM UTC and is marked aging.