prompts.chat
Prompt royalty
prompts.chat is apparently the portfolio’s gravitational center: one tidy name, an enormous audience, and enough prompt energy to make every other repository feel like a supporting character.
Profiles, repos, scores & roasts
#4 · Top 99.6%
Fatih Kadir Akın
Developer Advocate at @WordPress, @Automattic — Building prompts.chat — JavaScript Developer. AI Enthusiast. Author. — @GitHub Star.
Ship machine
silver medal
Overall
0.0/ 100
prompts.chat
prompts.chat is apparently the portfolio’s gravitational center: one tidy name, an enormous audience, and enough prompt energy to make every other repository feel like a supporting character.
git-rewrite-commits
git-rewrite-commits takes the normally sacred archaeological record of version control and hands it a red pen. Ambitious, useful, and mildly alarming in exactly the right developer-tooling way.
mcptools
mcptools sounds like someone looked at a new protocol and decided the appropriate response was to build a toolbox before the labels had finished drying.
textream
textream turns the most minimal possible product noun into a Swift project with enough apparent staying power to suggest that ‘just text’ was never going to remain simple.
101calculator
101calculator arrives with the confidence of a whole calculator franchise, while its recent appearance gives it the charming energy of opening day at a very small arithmetic theme park.
Impact
25% weight
The portfolio includes projects with substantial apparent usefulness and ambition, including a widely starred prompt-focused project, a Swift application, commit-history tooling, MCP tooling, and analytics work. Popularity is not used as a,
Consistency
15% weight
The supplied repositories show unusually recent activity across many projects, with dates concentrated in 2026 and one substantial project updated in late 2025; the long account history and 305 public repositories support sustained output.
Quality
25% weight
The supplied metadata indicates active ownership, a mix of non-fork and forked projects, and varied project scope. The available metadata does not provide enough information to assess engineering maturity directly.
Depth
20% weight
The account shows a large body of public work and several projects with meaningful apparent scope and sustained recent activity. Multiple repositories have accumulated substantial interest, while the metadata does not establish internal or
Breadth
10% weight
The listed work spans TypeScript, Ruby, Python, Swift, HTML, JavaScript, and Go, covering developer tooling, mobile software, web projects, prompt resources, analytics, and utilities.
Community
5% weight
The profile has a large follower count and several repositories with substantial stars, indicating strong external visibility. This is used only as a weak community signal and does not raise the other category scores.
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Non-fork sample
11
Last 12 months
2333
Accepted fact
11279
Profile date
Feb 2010
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
f /
94/100
A highly visible HTML-based prompt project with very recent activity, suggesting broad usefulness and exceptional reach, while implementation maturity remains unverified.
f /
88/100
A Go-based MCP tooling project with substantial apparent interest and a recent update, signaling ambitious and timely developer infrastructure work.
f /
86/100
Active TypeScript developer tooling focused on rewriting Git commits; the substantial apparent interest and recent update suggest a useful, sustained project.
f /
82/100
An actively maintained Swift project with a clear application-oriented identity and substantial apparent interest.
f /
76/100
A recently updated JavaScript analytics project with meaningful apparent interest, suggesting a useful data-oriented product or tool.
f /
65/100
An active JavaScript project with a distinctive short name and recent maintenance, indicating a meaningful web-oriented effort despite limited metadata about scope.
f /
58/100
A JavaScript project with recent activity and a focused product-like name; it appears credible but its depth is not established by the supplied fields.
f /
54/100
A Python deeplink collection or utility project with recent maintenance; its focused premise is credible, though the metadata shows limited scale.
f /
52/100
A recently maintained JavaScript prompt-focused project with a narrow apparent scope and modest visible traction.
f /
48/100
A Ruby Homebrew-related project with very recent activity, but limited visible scope and modest apparent interest in the supplied metadata.
f /
45/100
A very recent TypeScript calculator project with a clear utility premise, though the supplied metadata offers little evidence of depth yet.
f /
20/100
A fork of homebrew-cask with recent activity; because it is forked, the metadata provides limited evidence of independently owned project substance.
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 93 | 23.25 |
| Quality | 25% | 79 | 19.75 |
| Depth | 20% | 91 | 18.20 |
| Consistency | 15% | 94 | 14.10 |
| Breadth | 10% | 88 | 8.80 |
| Community | 5% | 97 | 4.85 |
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for f. The portfolio includes projects with substantial apparent usefulness and ambition, including a widely starred prompt-focused project, a Swift application, commit-history tooling, MCP tooling, and analytics work. Popularity is not used as a,
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for f. The supplied metadata indicates active ownership, a mix of non-fork and forked projects, and varied project scope. The available metadata does not provide enough information to assess engineering maturity directly.
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for f. The account shows a large body of public work and several projects with meaningful apparent scope and sustained recent activity. Multiple repositories have accumulated substantial interest, while the metadata does not establish internal or
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for f. The supplied repositories show unusually recent activity across many projects, with dates concentrated in 2026 and one substantial project updated in late 2025; the long account history and 305 public repositories support sustained output.
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for f. The listed work spans TypeScript, Ruby, Python, Swift, HTML, JavaScript, and Go, covering developer tooling, mobile software, web projects, prompt resources, analytics, and utilities.
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for f. The profile has a large follower count and several repositories with substantial stars, indicating strong external visibility. This is used only as a weak community signal and does not raise the other category scores.
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3