Repository binding unavailable
Markdown couture
You gave WeChat Markdown its own CSS wardrobe, proving even plain text can arrive overdressed for the occasion.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Roasts
dotfiles
Configuration archaeology
The dotfiles have been quietly fossilizing since 2015: one star, many VimL incantations, and possibly enough terminal personality to outlive the workstation.
xtuple-client
Forklift engineering
The xTuple client says ‘I can help move this project,’ while the fork badge adds a charming reminder that the forklift was borrowed.
Repository binding unavailable
The original homepage saga
A JavaScript GitHub Pages project from 2013: the web equivalent of finding an old mixtape and realizing the opening track is still surprisingly ambitious.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Category breakdown
Impact
25% weight
The portfolio includes a personal website, dotfiles, CSS for WeChat markdown, and several forks, but the supplied metadata supports only modest evidence of distinctive or broadly ambitious original work.
Consistency
15% weight
The visible activity is spread across 2013–2021, with no supplied repository updates after 2021; this suggests intermittent rather than sustained recent maintenance.
Quality
25% weight
Two non-fork projects identify concrete technologies or artifacts—CSS and VimL—and there is a JavaScript personal site, but metadata does not expose implementation or maturity details.
Depth
20% weight
The portfolio contains six repositories, but three are marked forks and the original projects show older update dates; metadata therefore supports limited evidence of sustained ownership or maintenance.
Breadth
10% weight
The repositories span CSS, VimL, JavaScript, personal configuration, web publishing, and forked projects, providing meaningful though limited variety.
Community
5% weight
The supplied profile has 32 followers and one repository star, but community signals are intentionally treated as a weak tie-breaker and do not materially change the assessment.
Stats
52-week commit heatmap
0 active daysLanguage distribution
4 langs
- Unknown50%
- CSS17%
- JavaScript17%
- VimL16%
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Numbers
Owned repos
Non-fork sample
3
Commits
Last 12 months
0
Followers
Accepted fact
32
Joined GitHub
Profile date
May 2009
Top repos
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
fstone /
wechat-markdown-css
42/100
An original CSS project for WeChat markdown styling, updated in 2018; it is a focused, practical web-presentation artifact.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingCSS
★ 0 · 8y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
fstone /
dotfiles
40/100
An original VimL dotfiles repository, updated in 2015, with one star; it represents a personal tooling and configuration project with a clear technical focus.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingVimL
★ 1 · 11y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
fstone /
fstone.github.io
37/100
An original JavaScript GitHub Pages repository, updated in 2013; it indicates an early personal web-publishing project, though its current scope and maintenance are unknown.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingJavaScript
★ 0 · 13y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
fstone /
xtuple-client
25/100
A forked xTuple client repository, updated in 2019; the metadata indicates participation in an existing project but gives little evidence of original scope or current maintenance.
ForkActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 0 · 7y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
fstone /
tinacms.org
24/100
A fork of the TinaCMS website project, updated in 2021; it suggests web-project involvement, while ownership and implementation depth are not established by the available metadata.
ForkActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 0 · 6y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
fstone /
ncl-graphics-zh
20/100
A forked graphics-related project with a Chinese-language name, updated in 2016; the available metadata supports limited conclusions beyond project participation.
ForkActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 0 · 10y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
Timeline
- Joined GitHub
- Created fstone/dotfiles - my dotfiles
- Created fstone/fstone.github.io
- Created fstone/ncl-graphics-zh
- Created fstone/wechat-markdown-css
- Most recent push to fstone/tinacms.org
- Created fstone/tinacms.org - Organization site for general info, documentation, blogs & contribution guidelines.
- Created fstone/xtuple-client - Last fetched from upstream on Jan 4, 2019
Compare
FSTONE · 6DMEDIAN CODER
Rubric
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 32 | 8.00 |
| Quality | 25% | 34 | 8.50 |
| Depth | 20% | 27 | 5.40 |
| Consistency | 15% | 24 | 3.60 |
| Breadth | 10% | 39 | 3.90 |
| Community | 5% | 50 | 2.50 |
Impact · 32/100
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for fstone. The portfolio includes a personal website, dotfiles, CSS for WeChat markdown, and several forks, but the supplied metadata supports only modest evidence of distinctive or broadly ambitious original work.
Quality · 34/100
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for fstone. Two non-fork projects identify concrete technologies or artifacts—CSS and VimL—and there is a JavaScript personal site, but metadata does not expose implementation or maturity details.
Depth · 27/100
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for fstone. The portfolio contains six repositories, but three are marked forks and the original projects show older update dates; metadata therefore supports limited evidence of sustained ownership or maintenance.
Consistency · 24/100
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for fstone. The visible activity is spread across 2013–2021, with no supplied repository updates after 2021; this suggests intermittent rather than sustained recent maintenance.
Breadth · 39/100
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for fstone. The repositories span CSS, VimL, JavaScript, personal configuration, web publishing, and forked projects, providing meaningful though limited variety.
Community · 50/100
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for fstone. The supplied profile has 32 followers and one repository star, but community signals are intentionally treated as a weak tie-breaker and do not materially change the assessment.
- Raw total
- 31.90
- Top-end curve
- +0.00
- Final overall
- 31.9
Tier thresholds
S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist
I. How this saved profile rating was produced
- 01
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
- 02
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
- 03
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
- 04
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
- 05
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3
II. Data sources & caveats
- Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
- Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
- Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
- Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
- Analysis completed Aug 9, 2026, 9:10 PM UTC and is marked aging.