Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
gamegamer43 GitHub avatar

#1071 · Top 2.2%

gamegamer43

Bryan Walters

F

GitHub tourist

red alert

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

gamegamer43 category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

31F

There are several recognizable software and infrastructure projects, but the metadata does not establish original authorship, distinctive additions, or broad usefulness for most entries.

Consistency

15% weight

28F

The supplied repositories span 2011–2022, but most visible projects are archived or forks, and there is no evidence of sustained recent ownership.

Quality

25% weight

30F

A few non-fork repositories and multiple technical domains are visible, but archived status, fork status, and missing implementation evidence limit maturity conclusions.

Depth

20% weight

25F

The visible set contains some substantial-sounding infrastructure and API projects, yet most are forks and the available dates do not demonstrate sustained maintenance or ownership.

Breadth

10% weight

54D

The portfolio covers Python, JavaScript, CoffeeScript, Java, Shell, PHP, Perl, Emacs Lisp, and unknown-language repositories, spanning applications, APIs, automation, and infrastructure.

Community

5% weight

50D

Follower and star information provides only a weak signal; the supplied evidence is insufficient to infer meaningful community impact, so this remains near neutral.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

180 active days

Language distribution

  • JavaScript17%
  • Python17%
  • Unknown17%
  • CoffeeScript9%
  • Emacs Lisp8%
  • Java8%
  • Perl8%
  • PHP8%
  • Shell8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

2

Commits

Last 12 months

4

Followers

Accepted fact

66

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Apr 2009

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created gamegamer43/gitolite - [NEWS: v2.0rc1 is out!] Gitolite allows you to setup a centralised git server, with very fine-grained access control and many (many!) more powerful features. For a short intro, plus links to online docs, click
  3. Created gamegamer43/class_proj10 - Repo for Python Class Assignment 10
  4. Created gamegamer43/irccloudplus - Chrome extension addon for irccloud
  5. Created gamegamer43/ansible - Model-driven configuration management, multi-node deployment, and remote task execution system
  6. Created gamegamer43/bitstarter
  7. Created gamegamer43/tabs-to-spaces - Atom package for converting between tabs and spaces
  8. Created gamegamer43/php-solusvm - SolusVM API PHP LIbrary
  9. Created gamegamer43/jira - Dockerized Atlassian Jira
  10. Created gamegamer43/docker-nexus3 - Dockerized version of Nexus Repo Manager 3
  11. Created gamegamer43/nexus-repository-composer - Composer support for the Nexus Repository Manager (work in progress!)
  12. Created gamegamer43/flagsmith
  13. Created gamegamer43/zohobooksapi
  14. Most recent push to gamegamer43/zohobooksapi

Compare

GAMEGAMER43 · 6DMEDIAN CODER

GAMEGAMER43 compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%317.75
Quality25%307.50
Depth20%255.00
Consistency15%284.20
Breadth10%545.40
Community5%502.50
Impact · 31/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for gamegamer43. There are several recognizable software and infrastructure projects, but the metadata does not establish original authorship, distinctive additions, or broad usefulness for most entries.

Quality · 30/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for gamegamer43. A few non-fork repositories and multiple technical domains are visible, but archived status, fork status, and missing implementation evidence limit maturity conclusions.

Depth · 25/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for gamegamer43. The visible set contains some substantial-sounding infrastructure and API projects, yet most are forks and the available dates do not demonstrate sustained maintenance or ownership.

Consistency · 28/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for gamegamer43. The supplied repositories span 2011–2022, but most visible projects are archived or forks, and there is no evidence of sustained recent ownership.

Breadth · 54/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for gamegamer43. The portfolio covers Python, JavaScript, CoffeeScript, Java, Shell, PHP, Perl, Emacs Lisp, and unknown-language repositories, spanning applications, APIs, automation, and infrastructure.

Community · 50/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for gamegamer43. Follower and star information provides only a weak signal; the supplied evidence is insufficient to infer meaningful community impact, so this remains near neutral.

Raw total
32.35
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
32.4

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 9, 2026, 9:11 PM UTC and is marked aging.