gstack
The main character repo
gstack apparently decided one repository was enough for an entire product suite, then showed up in TypeScript wearing a rocket pack.
Profiles, repos, scores & roasts
gstack
gstack apparently decided one repository was enough for an entire product suite, then showed up in TypeScript wearing a rocket pack.
gbrain
gbrain is the sort of name that skips the elevator pitch and goes straight to demanding a whiteboard, a launch plan, and perhaps a second brain.
Repository binding unavailable
gbrain-evals has the unmistakable energy of turning the evaluation spreadsheet into a public research arena—and then giving it a domain-shaped stage.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
alphaclaw
alphaclaw sounds like a side project that arrived with a full mythology, a sharp logo in its head, and just enough momentum to make the naming feel prophetic.
oembed_links
oembed_links is an archaeological artifact from the Ruby era, quietly reminding the modern project cluster that this portfolio has been collecting tools since the internet had different furniture.
Impact
25% weight
The owned TypeScript projects have unusually high apparent reach and suggest ambitious, distinctive work in a contemporary tooling or AI-oriented space. Impact is judged from project prominence and scope signals, while popularity is not the
Consistency
15% weight
The two leading owned repositories show activity in August 2026, with additional recent activity in the related 2026 projects. Older repositories indicate a long public history, though much of the visible portfolio is forked or inactive by
Quality
25% weight
Recent owned projects are substantial enough to signal meaningful project maturity, but the supplied metadata does not expose implementation, testing, CI, documentation, or architecture. The score therefore reflects strong project-level
Depth
20% weight
The profile shows long-term public activity and two prominent owned projects with very large visible reach and recent updates. Several related projects in 2026 suggest sustained engagement, while repository metadata alone cannot establish
Breadth
10% weight
The portfolio spans TypeScript, HTML, JavaScript, Shell, and Ruby, and includes both owned projects and forks across several eras. Variety is meaningful, though the strongest recent work is concentrated in TypeScript.
Community
5% weight
The profile has a large follower count and the leading repositories have substantial visible star counts, providing a positive tie-breaker for public community traction. This does not raise the other category scores.
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Non-fork sample
3
Last 12 months
928
Accepted fact
13559
Profile date
Aug 2008
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
garrytan /
94/100
Owned TypeScript project with very recent activity and exceptionally large visible reach, indicating a distinctive and substantial portfolio centerpiece.
garrytan /
89/100
Owned TypeScript project with recent activity and very large visible reach, suggesting ambitious work with strong public traction.
garrytan /
68/100
Owned HTML repository tied to the recent project cluster, with recent activity and meaningful visible interest; implementation depth is unknown.
garrytan /
45/100
Forked repository with recent activity in an emerging project area; the supplied metadata cannot separate local ownership from upstream work.
garrytan /
43/100
Recently updated JavaScript fork with some visible interest; metadata supports participation, not independent authorship or implementation quality.
garrytan /
38/100
Recent Shell fork associated with the newer project cluster, but the fork status limits what can be attributed to the profile.
garrytan /
31/100
Older JavaScript fork retained in the portfolio, showing historical participation but limited evidence of current ownership.
garrytan /
28/100
Older JavaScript fork with a small visible audience and no recent activity shown, providing modest historical evidence.
garrytan /
25/100
Older JavaScript fork with modest visible interest and no recent activity shown, mainly a historical portfolio artifact.
garrytan /
24/100
Older JavaScript fork that reflects historical participation but offers little current-maintenance evidence.
garrytan /
24/100
Early Ruby fork from 2008, useful as a historical signal but with little evidence of recent maintenance or independent scope.
garrytan /
23/100
Older Ruby fork with limited visible interest and no recent activity shown.
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 91 | 22.75 |
| Quality | 25% | 72 | 18.00 |
| Depth | 20% | 84 | 16.80 |
| Consistency | 15% | 78 | 11.70 |
| Breadth | 10% | 62 | 6.20 |
| Community | 5% | 82 | 4.10 |
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for garrytan. The owned TypeScript projects have unusually high apparent reach and suggest ambitious, distinctive work in a contemporary tooling or AI-oriented space. Impact is judged from project prominence and scope signals, while popularity is not the
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for garrytan. Recent owned projects are substantial enough to signal meaningful project maturity, but the supplied metadata does not expose implementation, testing, CI, documentation, or architecture. The score therefore reflects strong project-level
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for garrytan. The profile shows long-term public activity and two prominent owned projects with very large visible reach and recent updates. Several related projects in 2026 suggest sustained engagement, while repository metadata alone cannot establish
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for garrytan. The two leading owned repositories show activity in August 2026, with additional recent activity in the related 2026 projects. Older repositories indicate a long public history, though much of the visible portfolio is forked or inactive by
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for garrytan. The portfolio spans TypeScript, HTML, JavaScript, Shell, and Ruby, and includes both owned projects and forks across several eras. Variety is meaningful, though the strongest recent work is concentrated in TypeScript.
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for garrytan. The profile has a large follower count and the leading repositories have substantial visible star counts, providing a positive tie-breaker for public community traction. This does not raise the other category scores.
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3