Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
garrytan GitHub avatar

#21 · Top 98.1%

garrytan

Garry Tan

Writes software, dreams.

B

Solid engineer

bronze medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

garrytan category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

91S

The owned TypeScript projects have unusually high apparent reach and suggest ambitious, distinctive work in a contemporary tooling or AI-oriented space. Impact is judged from project prominence and scope signals, while popularity is not the

Consistency

15% weight

78B

The two leading owned repositories show activity in August 2026, with additional recent activity in the related 2026 projects. Older repositories indicate a long public history, though much of the visible portfolio is forked or inactive by

Quality

25% weight

72B

Recent owned projects are substantial enough to signal meaningful project maturity, but the supplied metadata does not expose implementation, testing, CI, documentation, or architecture. The score therefore reflects strong project-level

Depth

20% weight

84A

The profile shows long-term public activity and two prominent owned projects with very large visible reach and recent updates. Several related projects in 2026 suggest sustained engagement, while repository metadata alone cannot establish

Breadth

10% weight

62C

The portfolio spans TypeScript, HTML, JavaScript, Shell, and Ruby, and includes both owned projects and forks across several eras. Variety is meaningful, though the strongest recent work is concentrated in TypeScript.

Community

5% weight

82A

The profile has a large follower count and the leading repositories have substantial visible star counts, providing a positive tie-breaker for public community traction. This does not raise the other category scores.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

170 active days

Language distribution

  • JavaScript42%
  • Ruby17%
  • TypeScript17%
  • HTML8%
  • Shell8%
  • Unknown8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

3

Commits

Last 12 months

928

Followers

Accepted fact

13559

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Aug 2008

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created garrytan/oembed_links
  3. Created garrytan/protomultiselect - Facebook style multiselect input, using prototype
  4. Created garrytan/tinymce - TinyMCE is a platform independent web based Javascript HTML WYSIWYG editor control released as Open Source under LGPL.
  5. Created garrytan/rubber - A capistrano/rails plugin that makes it easy to deploy/manage/scale to EC2
  6. Created garrytan/zurb-foundation-wysihtml5
  7. Created garrytan/timber - The ultimate Shopify theme framework, built by Shopify.
  8. Created garrytan/gstack - Use Garry Tan's exact Claude Code setup: 23 opinionated tools that serve as CEO, Designer, Eng Manager, Release Manager, Doc Engineer, and QA
  9. Created garrytan/alphaclaw - The ultimate setup harness for OpenClaw. Deploy in minutes. Stay running for months. No CLI required.
  10. Created garrytan/gbrain - Garry's Opinionated OpenClaw/Hermes Agent Brain
  11. Created garrytan/openclaw - Your own personal AI assistant. Any OS. Any Platform. The lobster way. 🦞
  12. Created garrytan/gbrain-evals
  13. Created garrytan/openclaw-render-template - Fastest one-click OpenClaw deploy on Render. Simple, easy setup. Powered by AlphaClaw.
  14. Most recent push to garrytan/gbrain

Compare

GARRYTAN · 6DMEDIAN CODER

GARRYTAN compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%9122.75
Quality25%7218.00
Depth20%8416.80
Consistency15%7811.70
Breadth10%626.20
Community5%824.10
Impact · 91/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for garrytan. The owned TypeScript projects have unusually high apparent reach and suggest ambitious, distinctive work in a contemporary tooling or AI-oriented space. Impact is judged from project prominence and scope signals, while popularity is not the

Quality · 72/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for garrytan. Recent owned projects are substantial enough to signal meaningful project maturity, but the supplied metadata does not expose implementation, testing, CI, documentation, or architecture. The score therefore reflects strong project-level

Depth · 84/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for garrytan. The profile shows long-term public activity and two prominent owned projects with very large visible reach and recent updates. Several related projects in 2026 suggest sustained engagement, while repository metadata alone cannot establish

Consistency · 78/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for garrytan. The two leading owned repositories show activity in August 2026, with additional recent activity in the related 2026 projects. Older repositories indicate a long public history, though much of the visible portfolio is forked or inactive by

Breadth · 62/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for garrytan. The portfolio spans TypeScript, HTML, JavaScript, Shell, and Ruby, and includes both owned projects and forks across several eras. Variety is meaningful, though the strongest recent work is concentrated in TypeScript.

Community · 82/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for garrytan. The profile has a large follower count and the leading repositories have substantial visible star counts, providing a positive tie-breaker for public community traction. This does not raise the other category scores.

Raw total
79.55
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
79.6

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 9, 2026, 9:11 PM UTC and is marked aging.