Repository binding unavailable
Acoustic internet
You looked at data transmission and decided radio waves were too mainstream, so you gave the microphone a networking career.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
B
Solid engineer
bronze medal
Overall
0.0/ 100
Roasts
Repository binding unavailable
Keyboard séance
Turning keyboard sounds into a project is the rare move that makes every office clack feel like it is secretly transmitting classified packets.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
Terminal maximalism
Most people open a terminal; you built enough terminal-adjacent infrastructure to make the terminal wonder whether it needs a desktop environment.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
Morse code arc
The portfolio already had unusual audio communication, so naturally the next step was to make the dots and dashes join the extended universe.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
Replay side quest
Among the ambitious original experiments, the forked replay project is the portfolio equivalent of briefly stopping the boss fight to inspect a mysterious cardboard box.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Category breakdown
Impact
25% weight
The portfolio contains distinctive projects spanning audio communication, Morse, terminal interfaces, graphics tooling, and developer utilities. Several projects have substantial independent interest, while the metadata alone cannot verify実
Consistency
15% weight
The supplied repositories show ownership across multiple years, with several active or recently updated projects and a substantial public portfolio. The evidence does not provide complete contribution history, so this is strong rather than1
Quality
25% weight
Non-fork ownership, sustained project presence, multiple substantial repositories, and continued updates are positive maturity signals. The supplied public metadata indicates project presence and activity, but does not establish source code
Depth
20% weight
Multiple repositories appear to represent sustained ownership over several years, including sizeable and distinctive projects with recent updates. Metadata supports meaningful scope and continuity, but not implementation-level depth.
Breadth
10% weight
The listed work covers C++, C, and Vim Script, with varied project types including signal/audio tools, terminal software, UI infrastructure, and replay utilities. The language range is meaningful but concentrated.
Community
5% weight
The portfolio has strong visible community interest across several repositories and a large follower count. This is used only as a weak tie-breaker; unavailable evidence about broader collaboration is neutral.
Stats
52-week commit heatmap
332 active daysLanguage distribution
3 langs
- C++75%
- C17%
- Vim Script8%
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Numbers
Owned repos
Non-fork sample
11
Commits
Last 12 months
1937
Followers
Accepted fact
20376
Joined GitHub
Profile date
Jul 2012
Top repos
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
ggerganov /
ggwave
86/100
A distinctive C++ audio/data-transmission project with long-lived ownership and substantial visible interest.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingC++
★ 7794 · 4mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
ggerganov /
kbd-audio
84/100
A highly distinctive C++ audio/input project with sustained ownership and strong visible interest.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingC++
★ 9017 · 4y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
ggerganov /
imtui
79/100
A substantial C++ terminal/UI project with multi-year ownership and recent maintenance signals.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingC++
★ 3610 · 10mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
ggerganov /
wave-share
76/100
A long-lived C++ project combining audio and sharing concepts, suggesting durable scope and continued relevance.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingC++
★ 2311 · 6y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
ggerganov /
ggmorse
68/100
A specialized C++ Morse-oriented project with clear thematic identity and continued maintenance signals.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingC++
★ 306 · 2y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
ggerganov /
hnterm
64/100
A focused C++ terminal project with a clear niche and evidence of ongoing ownership.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingC++
★ 317 · 2y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
ggerganov /
imgui-ws
63/100
A C++ web or interface-oriented utility with a defined purpose and credible project scale.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingC++
★ 498 · 2y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
ggerganov /
whisper.spm
62/100
A focused C implementation centered on Whisper-related packaging or integration, with evidence of a real but narrower project.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingC
★ 191 · 2y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
ggerganov /
ggwave-spm
55/100
A focused C++ companion or variant project with recent activity, though the supplied metadata indicates a smaller footprint.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingC++
★ 17 · 5mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
ggerganov /
ggterm
53/100
A Vim Script terminal project with recent activity, adding a useful language and tooling dimension to the portfolio.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingVim Script
★ 75 · 7d agoOpen on GitHub ↗
ggerganov /
tmp2
42/100
A small C++ repository with recent activity; its limited visible scale makes it a developing project signal.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingC++
★ 13 · 2mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
ggerganov /
doomreplay
24/100
A forked C replay-related repository; ownership and originality signals are limited by its fork status.
ForkActiveProfile ratingC
★ 8 · 2y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
Timeline
- Joined GitHub
- Created ggerganov/wave-share - Serverless, peer-to-peer, local file sharing through sound
- Created ggerganov/kbd-audio - 🎤⌨️ Acoustic keyboard eavesdropping
- Created ggerganov/imgui-ws - Dear ImGui over WebSockets
- Created ggerganov/imtui - ImTui: Immediate Mode Text-based User Interface C++ Library
- Created ggerganov/hnterm - :page_with_curl: Hacker News in the terminal
- Created ggerganov/ggterm - Terminal configuration for C++ development with Vim
- Created ggerganov/ggwave - Tiny data-over-sound library
- Created ggerganov/ggwave-spm - ggwave package for the Swift Package Manager
- Created ggerganov/ggmorse - Morse code decoding library
- Created ggerganov/doomreplay - Replay Doom by providing keyboard input from a text file
- Created ggerganov/whisper.spm - whisper.cpp package for the Swift Package Manager
- Created ggerganov/tmp2
- Most recent push to ggerganov/ggterm
Compare
GGERGANOV · 6DMEDIAN CODER
Rubric
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 88 | 22.00 |
| Quality | 25% | 76 | 19.00 |
| Depth | 20% | 83 | 16.60 |
| Consistency | 15% | 78 | 11.70 |
| Breadth | 10% | 67 | 6.70 |
| Community | 5% | 74 | 3.70 |
Impact · 88/100
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for ggerganov. The portfolio contains distinctive projects spanning audio communication, Morse, terminal interfaces, graphics tooling, and developer utilities. Several projects have substantial independent interest, while the metadata alone cannot verify実
Quality · 76/100
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for ggerganov. Non-fork ownership, sustained project presence, multiple substantial repositories, and continued updates are positive maturity signals. The supplied public metadata indicates project presence and activity, but does not establish source code
Depth · 83/100
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for ggerganov. Multiple repositories appear to represent sustained ownership over several years, including sizeable and distinctive projects with recent updates. Metadata supports meaningful scope and continuity, but not implementation-level depth.
Consistency · 78/100
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for ggerganov. The supplied repositories show ownership across multiple years, with several active or recently updated projects and a substantial public portfolio. The evidence does not provide complete contribution history, so this is strong rather than1
Breadth · 67/100
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for ggerganov. The listed work covers C++, C, and Vim Script, with varied project types including signal/audio tools, terminal software, UI infrastructure, and replay utilities. The language range is meaningful but concentrated.
Community · 74/100
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for ggerganov. The portfolio has strong visible community interest across several repositories and a large follower count. This is used only as a weak tie-breaker; unavailable evidence about broader collaboration is neutral.
- Raw total
- 79.70
- Top-end curve
- +0.00
- Final overall
- 79.7
Tier thresholds
S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist
I. How this saved profile rating was produced
- 01
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
- 02
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
- 03
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
- 04
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
- 05
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3
II. Data sources & caveats
- Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
- Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
- Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
- Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
- Analysis completed Aug 9, 2026, 9:14 PM UTC and is marked aging.