Profiles, repos, scores & roasts
Repository binding unavailable
You did not merely build a browser extension; you apparently decided the web needed a full-time privacy customs officer, then kept updating the badge printer for years.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
A tool for inspecting browser scope is a wonderfully recursive idea: the browser gets watched, the watcher gets watched, and somewhere a tab is requesting legal counsel.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
An archived privacy project with a substantial history: even your discontinued tools have the energy of former cabinet ministers still being quoted at conferences.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
A dedicated extension-publishing utility suggests that shipping browser tools became such a serious operation it earned its own loading dock and clipboard.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Impact
25% weight
The portfolio includes a highly ambitious, widely used browser privacy blocker alongside related privacy and browser tooling. The project set is coherent and demonstrates substantial real-world usefulness and distinctive scope.
Consistency
15% weight
The portfolio shows ownership spanning 2011 through 2026, with major projects receiving activity in recent years and several older projects archived. The supplied dates support sustained engagement, though not continuous maintenance acrossT
Quality
25% weight
Repository metadata supports strong maturity signals: multiple substantial projects, continued updates, and a mix of active and deliberately archived work. The available metadata does not establish source-level engineering quality, tests,`n
Depth
20% weight
The long ownership history, major flagship project, related supporting tools, and continued recent activity indicate unusually sustained scope and specialization. Archived projects also suggest a substantial historical body of work.
Breadth
10% weight
Work spans JavaScript-heavy browser extensions and tools, plus one PHP project and one repository with an unknown language. The project-type range is meaningful but concentrated in browser privacy and web tooling.
Community
5% weight
Follower and star counts provide a positive but weak tie-breaker under the rubric. The portfolio has clear public visibility, while popularity is not used to inflate the other category scores.
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Non-fork sample
11
Last 12 months
1350
Accepted fact
6902
Profile date
Jan 2011
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
gorhill /
96/100
A flagship JavaScript browser privacy project with exceptional apparent usefulness, scope, longevity, and recent maintenance signals.
gorhill /
85/100
A major archived JavaScript privacy project showing substantial historical ambition, usefulness, and sustained ownership.
gorhill /
73/100
An active JavaScript browser-scope tool with meaningful related-project scope and recent maintenance.
gorhill /
72/100
An archived JavaScript browser privacy project with a substantial historical footprint and focused technical premise.
gorhill /
63/100
An actively updated JavaScript extension-publishing utility whose focused purpose suggests practical supporting infrastructure.
gorhill /
57/100
An archived JavaScript companion project with substantial historical visibility and a clear relationship to the privacy-tool portfolio.
gorhill /
48/100
A small JavaScript text-highlighting utility from the early period, representing a focused browser-oriented experiment.
gorhill /
47/100
A small JavaScript marker utility with early provenance and a focused, narrow project premise.
gorhill /
45/100
A JavaScript CodeMirror-related fork with recent activity, but fork status limits the evidence for wholly original ownership.
gorhill /
43/100
An early project with an unclear language classification and limited metadata, contributing modestly to the historical portfolio.
gorhill /
39/100
An archived PHP search-oriented project from the early portfolio, showing some language and project-purpose variety but limited current evidence.
gorhill /
34/100
An early JavaScript puzzle project with a small footprint and archived status, useful mainly as evidence of long-term history.
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 94 | 23.50 |
| Quality | 25% | 78 | 19.50 |
| Depth | 20% | 91 | 18.20 |
| Consistency | 15% | 82 | 12.30 |
| Breadth | 10% | 61 | 6.10 |
| Community | 5% | 68 | 3.40 |
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for gorhill. The portfolio includes a highly ambitious, widely used browser privacy blocker alongside related privacy and browser tooling. The project set is coherent and demonstrates substantial real-world usefulness and distinctive scope.
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for gorhill. Repository metadata supports strong maturity signals: multiple substantial projects, continued updates, and a mix of active and deliberately archived work. The available metadata does not establish source-level engineering quality, tests,`n
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for gorhill. The long ownership history, major flagship project, related supporting tools, and continued recent activity indicate unusually sustained scope and specialization. Archived projects also suggest a substantial historical body of work.
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for gorhill. The portfolio shows ownership spanning 2011 through 2026, with major projects receiving activity in recent years and several older projects archived. The supplied dates support sustained engagement, though not continuous maintenance acrossT
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for gorhill. Work spans JavaScript-heavy browser extensions and tools, plus one PHP project and one repository with an unknown language. The project-type range is meaningful but concentrated in browser privacy and web tooling.
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for gorhill. Follower and star counts provide a positive but weak tie-breaker under the rubric. The portfolio has clear public visibility, while popularity is not used to inflate the other category scores.
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3
