Owned repos
Non-fork sample
0
Roasts
No roast was saved for this accepted analysis.
Category breakdown
Impact
25% weight
No owned public projects are available in the supplied evidence, so project usefulness, ambition, and coherence cannot be demonstrated.
Consistency
15% weight
No public repositories or contribution evidence was supplied, so there is no observable portfolio activity to assess.
Quality
25% weight
The supplied evidence contains no repositories or engineering artifacts from which to assess project maturity or engineering quality.
Depth
20% weight
No public repositories or maintenance history are available, leaving sustained ownership and scope unsupported.
Breadth
10% weight
No public projects or languages are listed, so meaningful variety cannot be assessed.
Community
5% weight
Community evidence is unavailable beyond a small follower count; under the rubric, this is neutral rather than a penalty.
Stats
52-week commit heatmap
0 active daysLanguage distribution
0 langs
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Numbers
Commits
Last 12 months
0
Followers
Accepted fact
2
Joined GitHub
Profile date
Feb 2019
Top repos
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
No repository facts were saved for this accepted analysis.
Timeline
- Joined GitHub
Compare
H-FLAMME · 6DMEDIAN CODER
Rubric
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 0 | 0.00 |
| Quality | 25% | 0 | 0.00 |
| Depth | 20% | 0 | 0.00 |
| Consistency | 15% | 0 | 0.00 |
| Breadth | 10% | 0 | 0.00 |
| Community | 5% | 50 | 2.50 |
Impact · 0/100
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for h-flamme. No owned public projects are available in the supplied evidence, so project usefulness, ambition, and coherence cannot be demonstrated.
Quality · 0/100
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for h-flamme. The supplied evidence contains no repositories or engineering artifacts from which to assess project maturity or engineering quality.
Depth · 0/100
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for h-flamme. No public repositories or maintenance history are available, leaving sustained ownership and scope unsupported.
Consistency · 0/100
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for h-flamme. No public repositories or contribution evidence was supplied, so there is no observable portfolio activity to assess.
Breadth · 0/100
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for h-flamme. No public projects or languages are listed, so meaningful variety cannot be assessed.
Community · 50/100
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for h-flamme. Community evidence is unavailable beyond a small follower count; under the rubric, this is neutral rather than a penalty.
- Raw total
- 2.50
- Top-end curve
- +0.00
- Final overall
- 2.5
Tier thresholds
S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist
I. How this saved profile rating was produced
- 01
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
- 02
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
- 03
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
- 04
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
- 05
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3
II. Data sources & caveats
- Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
- Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
- Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
- Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
- Analysis completed Aug 9, 2026, 9:17 PM UTC and is marked aging.