Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
heilcheng GitHub avatar

#28 · Top 97.4%

heilcheng

hailey

Coglix Labs

B

Solid engineer

bronze medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

heilcheng category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

88A

The portfolio includes a highly visible agent-skills collection, evaluation projects, a drug-formulation project, and several applications, suggesting strong ambition and practical relevance.

Consistency

15% weight

82A

All 12 listed repositories are non-archived and show activity through late 2025 or 2026, indicating unusually sustained recent portfolio activity.

Quality

25% weight

62C

Available metadata indicates projects across TypeScript, Python, JavaScript, HTML, and notebooks, with varied activity and visibility; detailed project attributes cannot be verified from metadata alone.

Depth

20% weight

76B

Several projects appear substantial or sustained based on their names, specialization, activity, and visibility; however, implementation scope and maintenance details cannot be verified from metadata alone.

Breadth

10% weight

78B

The repositories span developer tooling, evaluation, scientific and medical work, websites, games or social applications, and multiple implementation languages.

Community

5% weight

86A

The profile has 964 followers and several repositories with notable star counts, providing a meaningful but secondary signal of public community resonance.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

94 active days

Language distribution

  • TypeScript33%
  • HTML17%
  • JavaScript17%
  • Python17%
  • Jupyter Notebook8%
  • Unknown8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

11

Commits

Last 12 months

360

Followers

Accepted fact

964

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Dec 2023

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created heilcheng/heilcheng
  3. Created heilcheng/truthordare
  4. Created heilcheng/openevals - Benchmarking suite for open-weight language models
  5. Created heilcheng/deepchem-drug-formulation - A computational tutorial for predicting drug formulation properties using DeepChem
  6. Created heilcheng/deepmind - Record for work at Google DeepMind
  7. Created heilcheng/gsoc_archive_2025 - Community archive of accepted GSoC 2025 accepted proposals for reference and inspiration.
  8. Created heilcheng/medexplain-evals - A benchmark for audience-adaptive medical explanation quality in LLMs
  9. Created heilcheng/website - Personal Website with Obsidian-like knowledge graph
  10. Created heilcheng/awesome-agent-skills - Tutorials, Guides and Agent Skills Directories
  11. Created heilcheng/mood - Where your moods 🐮 bloom · BUHACK 2026 1st runner up
  12. Created heilcheng/soar - fly the world as a bird
  13. Created heilcheng/charytype - aesthetic typing practice with music
  14. Most recent push to heilcheng/charytype

Compare

HEILCHENG · 6DMEDIAN CODER

HEILCHENG compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%8822.00
Quality25%6215.50
Depth20%7615.20
Consistency15%8212.30
Breadth10%787.80
Community5%864.30
Impact · 88/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for heilcheng. The portfolio includes a highly visible agent-skills collection, evaluation projects, a drug-formulation project, and several applications, suggesting strong ambition and practical relevance.

Quality · 62/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for heilcheng. Available metadata indicates projects across TypeScript, Python, JavaScript, HTML, and notebooks, with varied activity and visibility; detailed project attributes cannot be verified from metadata alone.

Depth · 76/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for heilcheng. Several projects appear substantial or sustained based on their names, specialization, activity, and visibility; however, implementation scope and maintenance details cannot be verified from metadata alone.

Consistency · 82/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for heilcheng. All 12 listed repositories are non-archived and show activity through late 2025 or 2026, indicating unusually sustained recent portfolio activity.

Breadth · 78/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for heilcheng. The repositories span developer tooling, evaluation, scientific and medical work, websites, games or social applications, and multiple implementation languages.

Community · 86/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for heilcheng. The profile has 964 followers and several repositories with notable star counts, providing a meaningful but secondary signal of public community resonance.

Raw total
77.10
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
77.1

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-09 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 9, 2026, 9:21 PM UTC and is marked aging.