dotfiles
Configuration couture
A dotfiles repository is the developer equivalent of a capsule wardrobe: every shell alias gets curated, and somehow the closet has been closed since 2014.
Roasts
Repository binding unavailable
Pipeline chef
cookbook-jenkins-jobs sounds like automation got hungry and started serving CI recipes—an admirably specific premise with a vintage timestamp on the menu.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
MoonScript moonshot
A MoonScript fork gives the portfolio a wonderfully lunar detour: rare language, niche orbit, and metadata that leaves the telescope pointed at 2016.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
kubecolor
Kubernetes color theory
kubecolor is the kind of tool premise that says infrastructure should be easier to read and slightly more fabulous, even if the visible evidence mostly says ‘fork in progress.’
Category breakdown
Impact
25% weight
There is some evidence of practical interests in automation, development tooling, environment management, and game-related software, but the portfolio is mostly forks and project scope is unavailable.
Consistency
15% weight
The supplied repositories span 2012 to 2020, with no evidence of recent sustained activity; most are older forks.
Quality
25% weight
Metadata shows a small set of non-fork projects, including dotfiles and cookbook-jenkins-jobs, but cannot establish implementation quality, testing, documentation, or maintainability.
Depth
20% weight
The visible portfolio contains only a few non-fork repositories and lacks evidence of sustained ownership, substantial scope, or ongoing maintenance.
Breadth
10% weight
The portfolio spans Ruby, JavaScript, Shell, Go, Python, MoonScript, and unknown-language repositories, with tooling, configuration, automation, and application-oriented projects represented.
Community
5% weight
No follower count beyond zero and mostly zero-star repositories provide meaningful positive evidence; under the rubric, unavailable or weak popularity evidence remains neutral.
Stats
52-week commit heatmap
0 active daysLanguage distribution
7 langs
- Ruby34%
- JavaScript17%
- Python17%
- Go8%
- MoonScript8%
- Shell8%
- Unknown8%
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Numbers
Owned repos
Non-fork sample
2
Commits
Last 12 months
0
Followers
Accepted fact
0
Joined GitHub
Profile date
Apr 2009
Top repos
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
jeekl /
dotfiles
43/100
Non-fork JavaScript dotfiles repository with activity through 2014; this is clear personal tooling, though its scale and maintenance cannot be assessed.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingJavaScript
★ 5 · 12y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jeekl /
cookbook-jenkins-jobs
42/100
Non-fork Ruby cookbook-jenkins-jobs repository, updated in 2012; a focused automation project with plausible practical utility, but limited visible evidence.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingRuby
★ 0 · 14y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jeekl /
beaker
24/100
Ruby fork of beaker, last shown active in 2015; a credible infrastructure-related project context, but ownership depth is unclear.
ForkActiveProfile ratingRuby
★ 0 · 11y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jeekl /
jenkins
24/100
Ruby fork of jenkins, with activity shown in 2013; the metadata supports an older derivative project but not independent scope.
ForkActiveProfile ratingRuby
★ 0 · 13y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jeekl /
kubecolor
23/100
Fork associated with kubecolor, using an unknown detected language and updated in 2019; the metadata indicates tooling interest but little evidence of independent work.
ForkActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 0 · 7y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jeekl /
mayday
22/100
Go fork related to mayday, updated in 2020; comparatively recent among the listed repositories, but the metadata does not establish ownership or scope.
ForkActiveProfile ratingGo
★ 0 · 6y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jeekl /
renpy2linux
22/100
Shell fork related to renpy2linux, updated in 2017; it suggests packaging or platform tooling, while independent contribution is unknown.
ForkActiveProfile ratingShell
★ 0 · 9y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jeekl /
hydrus
22/100
Python fork related to hydrus, updated in 2016; the project context suggests application involvement, but repository metadata alone cannot show depth.
ForkActiveProfile ratingPython
★ 0 · 10y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jeekl /
pupa
22/100
Ruby fork of pupa, updated in 2016; it adds ecosystem and language variety, with no supported evidence of independent implementation.
ForkActiveProfile ratingRuby
★ 0 · 10y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jeekl /
envdb
22/100
JavaScript fork related to envdb, updated in 2016; it indicates interest in environment tooling, though the supplied evidence is limited.
ForkActiveProfile ratingJavaScript
★ 0 · 10y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jeekl /
howl
21/100
MoonScript fork related to howl, updated in 2016; an unusual language signal broadens the portfolio, but maturity and ownership are unclear.
ForkActiveProfile ratingMoonScript
★ 0 · 10y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jeekl /
chef-docs
21/100
Python fork of chef-docs, updated in 2013; documentation-oriented ecosystem participation is visible, but this is not evidence of an owned project.
ForkActiveProfile ratingPython
★ 0 · 13y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
Timeline
- Joined GitHub
- Created jeekl/dotfiles - my ~/conf
- Created jeekl/cookbook-jenkins-jobs - Chef Cookbook containing Jenkins Job configuration files
- Created jeekl/chef-docs - All The Documentation
- Created jeekl/jenkins - Development repository for Opscode Cookbook jenkins
- Created jeekl/beaker - Puppet Acceptance Testing Harness
- Created jeekl/envdb - Envdb - Ask your environment questions.
- Created jeekl/howl - The Howl Editor
- Created jeekl/pupa - Bootstrap Puppet 4 and personal configuration
- Created jeekl/hydrus - A personal booru-style media tagger that can import files and tags from your hard drive and popular websites. Content can be shared with other users via user-run servers.
- Created jeekl/mayday - A diagnostics tool for capturing system state.
- Created jeekl/renpy2linux - Convert a Windows Ren'Py-based game into a Linux-compatible one.
- Created jeekl/kubecolor - Simplify and colorize the output of kubectl get events -w
- Most recent push to jeekl/mayday
Compare
JEEKL · 6DMEDIAN CODER
Rubric
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 35 | 8.75 |
| Quality | 25% | 31 | 7.75 |
| Depth | 20% | 29 | 5.80 |
| Consistency | 15% | 27 | 4.05 |
| Breadth | 10% | 58 | 5.80 |
| Community | 5% | 50 | 2.50 |
Impact · 35/100
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for jeekl. There is some evidence of practical interests in automation, development tooling, environment management, and game-related software, but the portfolio is mostly forks and project scope is unavailable.
Quality · 31/100
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for jeekl. Metadata shows a small set of non-fork projects, including dotfiles and cookbook-jenkins-jobs, but cannot establish implementation quality, testing, documentation, or maintainability.
Depth · 29/100
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for jeekl. The visible portfolio contains only a few non-fork repositories and lacks evidence of sustained ownership, substantial scope, or ongoing maintenance.
Consistency · 27/100
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for jeekl. The supplied repositories span 2012 to 2020, with no evidence of recent sustained activity; most are older forks.
Breadth · 58/100
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for jeekl. The portfolio spans Ruby, JavaScript, Shell, Go, Python, MoonScript, and unknown-language repositories, with tooling, configuration, automation, and application-oriented projects represented.
Community · 50/100
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for jeekl. No follower count beyond zero and mostly zero-star repositories provide meaningful positive evidence; under the rubric, unavailable or weak popularity evidence remains neutral.
- Raw total
- 34.65
- Top-end curve
- +0.00
- Final overall
- 34.7
Tier thresholds
S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist
I. How this saved profile rating was produced
- 01
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
- 02
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
- 03
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
- 04
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
- 05
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3
II. Data sources & caveats
- Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
- Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
- Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
- Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
- Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 12:04 AM UTC and is marked aging.