Repository binding unavailable
Scheduler supremacy
You looked at coding agents and decided their biggest enemy was an empty calendar. Ambitious premise, impressively specific battlefield.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Roasts
codemaxxing
Maximum terminal energy
Codemaxxing sounds less like a repository and more like a lifestyle choice made after one too many tabs. At least the premise commits fully.
claude-code-image
Image pipeline theater
Claude-code-image suggests the shell script has been promoted to art director. The concept is compact, focused, and gloriously automation-brained.
vercel-cost-guard
Cloud bill bouncer
Vercel-cost-guard is the portfolio’s designated adult, standing at the door of deployment asking whether that invoice is really necessary.
mcp_evals
Fork in the evaluation road
MCP evals joins the portfolio like a borrowed lab instrument: pointed at a serious problem, while leaving the ownership story delightfully complicated.
Category breakdown
Impact
25% weight
The portfolio centers on practical developer tooling, scheduling, automation, cost control, evaluation, and AI-assisted workflows. Several project premises are distinctive and ambitious, though metadata alone cannot verify implementation or
Consistency
15% weight
The supplied repositories show a dense pattern of recent updates from December 2025 through May 2026, with many distinct projects active in the same period.
Quality
25% weight
Non-fork, non-archived status and repeated recent activity provide positive maturity signals, but the evidence excludes source, tests, CI, documentation, and architecture, so engineering quality can only be scored moderately.
Depth
20% weight
Sixteen public repositories overall and multiple substantial-looking, actively updated projects indicate sustained ownership across a coherent tooling theme. Forked repositories are treated as weaker evidence of owned depth.
Breadth
10% weight
The portfolio spans Python, Swift, TypeScript, Shell, and repositories with unspecified languages, covering automation, developer tools, AI workflows, infrastructure controls, and evaluation-oriented projects.
Community
5% weight
Follower and star data provide a modest positive tie-breaker, with several projects showing visible interest. Popularity does not raise the other category scores, and zero-star projects remain neutral.
Stats
52-week commit heatmap
49 active daysLanguage distribution
5 langs
- Unknown50%
- Shell17%
- Swift17%
- Python8%
- TypeScript8%
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Numbers
Owned repos
Non-fork sample
10
Commits
Last 12 months
2014
Followers
Accepted fact
62
Joined GitHub
Profile date
Feb 2014
Top repos
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
jshchnz /
claude-code-scheduler
84/100
A non-fork TypeScript project with an ambitious developer-workflow premise, recent maintenance, and the strongest visible interest in the set.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingTypeScript
★ 508 · 7mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jshchnz /
codemaxxing
78/100
A non-fork, actively updated Python project with a memorable coding-focused premise and substantial visible interest; implementation depth is unavailable.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingPython
★ 193 · 4mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jshchnz /
codemaxxed
76/100
A non-fork, recently updated project with a striking companion-style name and substantial visible interest; its language and technical scope are unspecified.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 309 · 3mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jshchnz /
refiner
67/100
A non-fork Swift project updated recently, suggesting a focused utility with continued ownership; available metadata does not establish its feature scope.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingSwift
★ 49 · 5mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jshchnz /
claude-jobs
64/100
A recently updated non-fork Shell project centered on automated jobs, showing practical workflow ambition without enough evidence to judge completeness.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingShell
★ 65 · 6mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jshchnz /
mymcp
63/100
A recently updated, non-fork Swift project suggesting work in the same developer-tooling ecosystem; details of scope and maturity are unavailable.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingSwift
★ 29 · 7mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jshchnz /
sentry-workflows-plugin
58/100
A very recent non-fork project connected to workflow tooling; unspecified language and limited metadata leave its scope and maturity uncertain.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 0 · 2mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jshchnz /
vercel-cost-guard
57/100
A recent non-fork project with a concrete cloud-cost-control premise, but the available metadata is insufficient to assess execution depth.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 2 · 6mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jshchnz /
claude-code-image
55/100
A recent non-fork Shell project with a focused AI-image tooling premise; the narrow metadata supports activity but not implementation assessment.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingShell
★ 6 · 6mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jshchnz /
tribute
55/100
A recently updated non-fork project with an evocative name, though its purpose, language, and technical scope are unspecified.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 14 · 7mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jshchnz /
mcp_evals
42/100
A recent fork related to evaluation tooling; it contributes evidence of ecosystem engagement more than independently attributable project depth.
ForkActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 0 · 6mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
jshchnz /
sentry-mcp
40/100
A recent fork in the MCP tooling area, indicating participation in a current ecosystem but limited evidence of independent ownership.
ForkActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 0 · 8mo agoOpen on GitHub ↗
Timeline
- Joined GitHub
- Created jshchnz/sentry-mcp - An MCP server for interacting with Sentry via LLMs.
- Created jshchnz/mymcp - Discover, install and manage MCP servers on macOS
- Created jshchnz/claude-code-scheduler - Put Claude on autopilot
- Created jshchnz/tribute - Discover and fund the open source projects your code depends on
- Created jshchnz/claude-code-image
- Created jshchnz/claude-jobs - Claude Code skill for querying job openings at tech companies
- Created jshchnz/mcp_evals
- Created jshchnz/vercel-cost-guard
- Created jshchnz/refiner - A macOS app for data refinement
- Created jshchnz/codemaxxed
- Created jshchnz/codemaxxing
- Created jshchnz/sentry-workflows-plugin - Preview Sentry workflows for Claude Code — open fix PRs, groom stale issues, run as Claude Routines
- Most recent push to jshchnz/sentry-workflows-plugin
Compare
JSHCHNZ · 6DMEDIAN CODER
Rubric
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 84 | 21.00 |
| Quality | 25% | 64 | 16.00 |
| Depth | 20% | 78 | 15.60 |
| Consistency | 15% | 82 | 12.30 |
| Breadth | 10% | 72 | 7.20 |
| Community | 5% | 58 | 2.90 |
Impact · 84/100
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for jshchnz. The portfolio centers on practical developer tooling, scheduling, automation, cost control, evaluation, and AI-assisted workflows. Several project premises are distinctive and ambitious, though metadata alone cannot verify implementation or
Quality · 64/100
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for jshchnz. Non-fork, non-archived status and repeated recent activity provide positive maturity signals, but the evidence excludes source, tests, CI, documentation, and architecture, so engineering quality can only be scored moderately.
Depth · 78/100
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for jshchnz. Sixteen public repositories overall and multiple substantial-looking, actively updated projects indicate sustained ownership across a coherent tooling theme. Forked repositories are treated as weaker evidence of owned depth.
Consistency · 82/100
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for jshchnz. The supplied repositories show a dense pattern of recent updates from December 2025 through May 2026, with many distinct projects active in the same period.
Breadth · 72/100
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for jshchnz. The portfolio spans Python, Swift, TypeScript, Shell, and repositories with unspecified languages, covering automation, developer tools, AI workflows, infrastructure controls, and evaluation-oriented projects.
Community · 58/100
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for jshchnz. Follower and star data provide a modest positive tie-breaker, with several projects showing visible interest. Popularity does not raise the other category scores, and zero-star projects remain neutral.
- Raw total
- 75.00
- Top-end curve
- +0.00
- Final overall
- 75.0
Tier thresholds
S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist
I. How this saved profile rating was produced
- 01
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
- 02
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
- 03
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
- 04
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
- 05
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3
II. Data sources & caveats
- Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
- Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
- Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
- Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
- Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 12:09 AM UTC and is marked aging.