Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
kazupon GitHub avatar

#8 · Top 99.3%

kazupon

kazuya kawaguchi

software engineer, @vuejs core team member, creator of gunshi, @intlify & i18n enthusiast, vue fes japan & @vuejs-jp organizer, and wasm love

A

Ship machine

silver medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

kazupon category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

94S

The portfolio includes highly recognizable developer tooling and localization projects, with several repositories showing substantial community interest. Project names indicate a coherent focus on practical JavaScript and TypeScript tooling

Consistency

15% weight

85A

The supplied repositories show repeated recent pushes across many owned projects, alongside a long public history. Some prominent older projects are archived, so the pattern is strong but not uniformly current.

Quality

25% weight

81A

Metadata supports strong engineering maturity signals through sustained ownership, dedicated tooling projects, and clear ecosystem focus. Source code, tests, CI, documentation, and architecture were not available for direct assessment.

Depth

20% weight

91S

The combination of a long contribution history, many owned repositories, substantial projects such as vue-i18n and vue-validator, and active newer tooling indicates sustained ownership and significant scope.

Breadth

10% weight

68C

The visible portfolio spans JavaScript, TypeScript, and Shell, and includes localization, CLI, build, configuration, API-reference, and utility projects. The language and project-type range is meaningful but centered on one ecosystem.

Community

5% weight

76B

Follower and star counts provide a positive but limited tie-breaker. Several projects have notable public interest, while many others have modest or unavailable adoption evidence; popularity does not determine the other scores.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

344 active days

Language distribution

  • TypeScript67%
  • JavaScript17%
  • Shell8%
  • Unknown8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

11

Commits

Last 12 months

2742

Followers

Accepted fact

4339

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Apr 2009

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created kazupon/vue-validator - :white_check_mark: Validator component for Vue.js
  3. Created kazupon/vue-i18n - :globe_with_meridians: Internationalization plugin for Vue.js
  4. Created kazupon/gh-changelogen - Changelog generator for GitHub Releases
  5. Created kazupon/prettier-config - Prettier config for @kauzpon
  6. Created kazupon/jts-utils
  7. Created kazupon/pnpmc - pnpm catalogs tooling
  8. Created kazupon/japanese-companies-using-vuejs - 日本で Vue.js を使っている企業一覧
  9. Created kazupon/args-tokens - parseArgs tokens compatibility and more high-performance parser
  10. Created kazupon/gunshi - Gunshi: Modern javascript command-line library
  11. Created kazupon/vp-config - Vite Plus configuration for @kazupon
  12. Created kazupon/vite-plugin-makefile - Vite plugin that converts Makefile targets into vite-plus tasks
  13. Created kazupon/vitepress-api-references - Enable JSDoc API Reference for VitePress
  14. Most recent push to kazupon/gh-changelogen

Compare

KAZUPON · 6DMEDIAN CODER

KAZUPON compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%9423.50
Quality25%8120.25
Depth20%9118.20
Consistency15%8512.75
Breadth10%686.80
Community5%763.80
Impact · 94/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for kazupon. The portfolio includes highly recognizable developer tooling and localization projects, with several repositories showing substantial community interest. Project names indicate a coherent focus on practical JavaScript and TypeScript tooling

Quality · 81/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for kazupon. Metadata supports strong engineering maturity signals through sustained ownership, dedicated tooling projects, and clear ecosystem focus. Source code, tests, CI, documentation, and architecture were not available for direct assessment.

Depth · 91/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for kazupon. The combination of a long contribution history, many owned repositories, substantial projects such as vue-i18n and vue-validator, and active newer tooling indicates sustained ownership and significant scope.

Consistency · 85/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for kazupon. The supplied repositories show repeated recent pushes across many owned projects, alongside a long public history. Some prominent older projects are archived, so the pattern is strong but not uniformly current.

Breadth · 68/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for kazupon. The visible portfolio spans JavaScript, TypeScript, and Shell, and includes localization, CLI, build, configuration, API-reference, and utility projects. The language and project-type range is meaningful but centered on one ecosystem.

Community · 76/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for kazupon. Follower and star counts provide a positive but limited tie-breaker. Several projects have notable public interest, while many others have modest or unavailable adoption evidence; popularity does not determine the other scores.

Raw total
85.30
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
85.3

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 12:12 AM UTC and is marked aging.