Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
kunchenguid GitHub avatar

#12 · Top 98.9%

kunchenguid

Kun Chen

Member of the Technical Community. Former L8 engineer at Meta, Microsoft, Atlassian.

A

Ship machine

silver medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

kunchenguid category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

88A

The portfolio contains numerous apparently owned, non-forked projects with substantial visible interest and a mix of utility, application, and tooling-oriented names; ambition and usefulness are suggested, though implementation details are,

Consistency

15% weight

93S

The supplied repositories show recent push dates clustered across late July and August 2026, indicating an unusually active current contribution pattern across many projects.

Quality

25% weight

72B

Metadata supports signals of project maturity such as multiple actively maintained repositories, varied technologies, and several projects with substantial external interest. The supplied metadata does not establish source, tests, CI, or

Depth

20% weight

86A

Seventy public repositories, twelve listed active non-forks, concentrated recent updates, and several projects with sustained visible interest indicate substantial ownership and ongoing investment.

Breadth

10% weight

74B

The listed work spans Shell, HTML, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, and Python, with apparent coverage of command-line tools, configuration, web-oriented projects, and application utilities.

Community

5% weight

78B

The profile has substantial follower evidence and several repositories with notable stars, providing a positive but limited community signal. Popularity is treated only as a tie-breaker and does not drive the other scores.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

195 active days

Language distribution

  • TypeScript42%
  • Go17%
  • Shell17%
  • HTML8%
  • JavaScript8%
  • Python8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

12

Commits

Last 12 months

1687

Followers

Accepted fact

4408

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Jan 2013

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created kunchenguid/treehouse - Manage worktrees without managing worktrees.
  3. Created kunchenguid/axi - Design principles for agent ergonomics. Higher accuracy with lower token cost than both MCP and regular CLI.
  4. Created kunchenguid/gnhf - Before I go to bed, I tell my agents: good night, have fun
  5. Created kunchenguid/no-mistakes - git push no-mistakes
  6. Created kunchenguid/lavish-axi - HTML is the new markdown. Lavish is the new editor for your HTML artifacts.
  7. Created kunchenguid/baby-menu - A menu bar app that can become anything you ask it to be.
  8. Created kunchenguid/firstmate - Talk to one agent. Ship with a crew.
  9. Created kunchenguid/tasks-axi - Agent-ergonomic CLI for task/backlog management with pluggable backends (markdown, sqlite, remote trackers)
  10. Created kunchenguid/wheelhouse - Wheelhouse - steer your open-source maintenance from one place. A portable IssueOps command center: cross-repo decision cards driven by GitHub Actions, decided by checkbox or plain English.
  11. Created kunchenguid/dotfiles - Kun's dotfiles for agentic engineering
  12. Created kunchenguid/quota-axi - Allow your agents to see your LLM subscription quota windows.
  13. Created kunchenguid/vision - Agent skill that mines your repo's history to draft a VISION.md, stress-tests it with hard hypotheticals, and iterates with you on an interactive review board.
  14. Most recent push to kunchenguid/firstmate

Compare

KUNCHENGUID · 6DMEDIAN CODER

KUNCHENGUID compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%8822.00
Quality25%7218.00
Depth20%8617.20
Consistency15%9313.95
Breadth10%747.40
Community5%783.90
Impact · 88/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for kunchenguid. The portfolio contains numerous apparently owned, non-forked projects with substantial visible interest and a mix of utility, application, and tooling-oriented names; ambition and usefulness are suggested, though implementation details are,

Quality · 72/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for kunchenguid. Metadata supports signals of project maturity such as multiple actively maintained repositories, varied technologies, and several projects with substantial external interest. The supplied metadata does not establish source, tests, CI, or

Depth · 86/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for kunchenguid. Seventy public repositories, twelve listed active non-forks, concentrated recent updates, and several projects with sustained visible interest indicate substantial ownership and ongoing investment.

Consistency · 93/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for kunchenguid. The supplied repositories show recent push dates clustered across late July and August 2026, indicating an unusually active current contribution pattern across many projects.

Breadth · 74/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for kunchenguid. The listed work spans Shell, HTML, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, and Python, with apparent coverage of command-line tools, configuration, web-oriented projects, and application utilities.

Community · 78/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for kunchenguid. The profile has substantial follower evidence and several repositories with notable stars, providing a positive but limited community signal. Popularity is treated only as a tie-breaker and does not drive the other scores.

Raw total
82.45
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
82.5

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 12:19 AM UTC and is marked aging.