Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
kyleamathews GitHub avatar

#29 · Top 97.4%

kyleamathews

Kyle Mathews

B

Solid engineer

bronze medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

kyleamathews category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

84A

The portfolio includes distinctive developer tools, UI components, typography resources, typefaces, and experimental applications. Several projects appear broadly useful based on their names and substantial independent interest, though only

Consistency

15% weight

78B

The supplied repositories show ownership across a long span, from 2017 through 2026, with multiple recent pushes in 2026 and several maintained projects updated through 2022-2023.

Quality

25% weight

67C

Non-fork, non-archived ownership and continued updates are positive maturity signals. However, source, tests, CI, documentation, and implementation quality are unavailable, so this score remains cautious.

Depth

20% weight

80A

The portfolio indicates sustained ownership over many years, with multiple projects receiving later updates and several projects having enough apparent scope to represent reusable libraries or substantial tools. Internal depth cannot be20

Breadth

10% weight

82A

The listed work spans TypeScript, JavaScript, CoffeeScript, CSS, HTML, and an unspecified-language project, covering UI libraries, design assets, data export, AI tooling, and experimental applications.

Community

5% weight

50D

Community evidence is neutral-to-positive as a weak tie-breaker: the profile has many followers and several repositories show substantial public interest, but popularity does not determine the other categories.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

307 active days

Language distribution

  • JavaScript25%
  • TypeScript25%
  • CoffeeScript17%
  • CSS17%
  • HTML8%
  • Unknown8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

12

Commits

Last 12 months

1515

Followers

Accepted fact

3908

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Apr 2009

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created kyleamathews/facebook-export - Tools to help administer your Facebook groups
  3. Created kyleamathews/react-gravatar - React component for rendering a gravatar profile image
  4. Created kyleamathews/superagent-bluebird-promise - Add promise support to superagent using Bluebird
  5. Created kyleamathews/react-spinkit - A collection of loading indicators animated with CSS for React
  6. Created kyleamathews/react-headroom - Hide your header until you need it
  7. Created kyleamathews/typography.js - A powerful toolkit for building websites with beautiful design
  8. Created kyleamathews/typefaces - NPM packages for Open Source typefaces
  9. Created kyleamathews/kitchen-ai
  10. Created kyleamathews/claude-code-ui - Claude Code session tracker UI with real-time updates via Durable Streams
  11. Created kyleamathews/field-lab - A field lab for thinking with AI
  12. Created kyleamathews/scratch-food-rubrics - AI-powered rubrics for finding restaurants and bakeries that make food from scratch
  13. Created kyleamathews/dialectic-press - Claude Code skill for transforming dialectic outputs into Venkatesh Rao-style essays
  14. Most recent push to kyleamathews/field-lab

Compare

KYLEAMATHEWS · 6DMEDIAN CODER

KYLEAMATHEWS compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%8421.00
Quality25%6716.75
Depth20%8016.00
Consistency15%7811.70
Breadth10%828.20
Community5%502.50
Impact · 84/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for kyleamathews. The portfolio includes distinctive developer tools, UI components, typography resources, typefaces, and experimental applications. Several projects appear broadly useful based on their names and substantial independent interest, though only

Quality · 67/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for kyleamathews. Non-fork, non-archived ownership and continued updates are positive maturity signals. However, source, tests, CI, documentation, and implementation quality are unavailable, so this score remains cautious.

Depth · 80/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for kyleamathews. The portfolio indicates sustained ownership over many years, with multiple projects receiving later updates and several projects having enough apparent scope to represent reusable libraries or substantial tools. Internal depth cannot be20

Consistency · 78/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for kyleamathews. The supplied repositories show ownership across a long span, from 2017 through 2026, with multiple recent pushes in 2026 and several maintained projects updated through 2022-2023.

Breadth · 82/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for kyleamathews. The listed work spans TypeScript, JavaScript, CoffeeScript, CSS, HTML, and an unspecified-language project, covering UI libraries, design assets, data export, AI tooling, and experimental applications.

Community · 50/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for kyleamathews. Community evidence is neutral-to-positive as a weak tie-breaker: the profile has many followers and several repositories show substantial public interest, but popularity does not determine the other categories.

Raw total
76.15
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
76.2

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 12:20 AM UTC and is marked aging.