gatsby-starter-netlify-cms
CMS with ambitions
gatsby-starter-netlify-cms sounds like it arrived ready to run a publishing empire, while the metadata only confirms the starter was invited to the party.
Roasts
enterpriseape
Enterprise, singular
enterpriseape is an impressively large corporate promise packed into one repository name: all the boardroom energy, none of the supplied evidence about the meeting agenda.
project1
The naming sprint
project1 is the software equivalent of opening a notebook with a bold title and postponing chapter two indefinitely.
designernewsapp
Design safari
designernewsapp shows a leap into Swift and mobile territory, making this portfolio feel like it briefly wandered from web experiments into an app-store expedition.
protoshow
Prototype archaeology
protoshow is an archaeological layer from 2012: a tiny time capsule suggesting demos were being assembled before the portfolio settled on its next era.
Category breakdown
Impact
25% weight
There are several distinct project ideas, including a CMS starter, an enterprise-themed Ruby project, and app or design-related work, but the metadata does not establish usefulness, originality, or adoption.
Consistency
15% weight
The repositories cluster between 2012 and 2018, with no supplied activity after 2020 and no contribution totals, indicating limited evidence of sustained recent work.
Quality
25% weight
The mix of original-looking repositories and forks provides some evidence of experimentation, but the supplied metadata contains no implementation, testing, documentation, or release signals to support stronger maturity claims.
Depth
20% weight
Nine repositories suggest repeated exploration, but several are forks and the dates are largely historical; metadata alone provides limited evidence of sustained ownership or maintenance.
Breadth
10% weight
The portfolio spans JavaScript, Ruby, Swift, and projects with unknown languages, covering web, app, design, and prototype-oriented names.
Community
5% weight
Community evidence is unavailable or minimal beyond one follower and zero listed stars; this is treated as neutral rather than negative.
Stats
52-week commit heatmap
0 active daysLanguage distribution
4 langs
- JavaScript56%
- Unknown22%
- Ruby11%
- Swift11%
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Numbers
Owned repos
Non-fork sample
4
Commits
Last 12 months
0
Followers
Accepted fact
1
Joined GitHub
Profile date
Jan 2015
Top repos
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
praneethpike /
gatsby-starter-netlify-cms
46/100
A standalone JavaScript Gatsby starter using Netlify CMS, suggesting a practical web publishing direction and a more substantial project premise than the small prototypes.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingJavaScript
★ 0 · 8y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
praneethpike /
enterpriseape
42/100
A standalone Ruby repository with an enterprise-oriented name, indicating experimentation beyond the otherwise JavaScript-heavy set.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingRuby
★ 0 · 11y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
praneethpike /
cottonwood
39/100
A standalone JavaScript project with an evocative, nature-themed name; the metadata confirms a project but not its scope or completion.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingJavaScript
★ 0 · 11y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
praneethpike /
project1
35/100
A standalone repository named project1; its generic naming and unknown language leave the project’s purpose and maturity unclear.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 0 · 11y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
praneethpike /
designernewsapp
27/100
A Swift fork associated with a design-news application, representing mobile-oriented exploration while providing limited evidence of independent implementation.
ForkActiveProfile ratingSwift
★ 0 · 11y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
praneethpike /
appstoresketch
24/100
A fork with a design-tool-oriented name, suggesting interest in app-store presentation or prototyping rather than clearly established original ownership.
ForkActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 0 · 11y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
praneethpike /
jspdf
24/100
A JavaScript fork of jspdf, showing familiarity with an existing project but limited evidence of original ownership from the supplied metadata.
ForkActiveProfile ratingJavaScript
★ 0 · 12y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
praneethpike /
kwicks
23/100
A JavaScript fork named kwicks, showing experimentation with an existing web project but little metadata evidence of independent scope.
ForkActiveProfile ratingJavaScript
★ 0 · 13y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
praneethpike /
protoshow
22/100
An older JavaScript fork named protoshow, consistent with early prototyping or presentation experimentation but with limited evidence of sustained ownership.
ForkActiveProfile ratingJavaScript
★ 0 · 14y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
Timeline
- Joined GitHub
- Created praneethpike/protoshow - A simple slideshow for Prototype.js and script.aculo.us
- Created praneethpike/kwicks - Kwicks - sexy sliding panels for jQuery
- Created praneethpike/project1 - Test Project
- Created praneethpike/jspdf - Generate PDF files in JavaScript. HTML5 FTW.
- Created praneethpike/appstoresketch - A quick App Store template for Sketch
- Created praneethpike/designernewsapp - Build a Swift App as a designer
- Created praneethpike/cottonwood
- Created praneethpike/enterpriseape
- Created praneethpike/gatsby-starter-netlify-cms
- Most recent push to praneethpike/gatsby-starter-netlify-cms
Compare
PRANEETHPIKE · 6DMEDIAN CODER
Rubric
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 38 | 9.50 |
| Quality | 25% | 32 | 8.00 |
| Depth | 20% | 29 | 5.80 |
| Consistency | 15% | 28 | 4.20 |
| Breadth | 10% | 48 | 4.80 |
| Community | 5% | 50 | 2.50 |
Impact · 38/100
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for praneethpike. There are several distinct project ideas, including a CMS starter, an enterprise-themed Ruby project, and app or design-related work, but the metadata does not establish usefulness, originality, or adoption.
Quality · 32/100
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for praneethpike. The mix of original-looking repositories and forks provides some evidence of experimentation, but the supplied metadata contains no implementation, testing, documentation, or release signals to support stronger maturity claims.
Depth · 29/100
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for praneethpike. Nine repositories suggest repeated exploration, but several are forks and the dates are largely historical; metadata alone provides limited evidence of sustained ownership or maintenance.
Consistency · 28/100
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for praneethpike. The repositories cluster between 2012 and 2018, with no supplied activity after 2020 and no contribution totals, indicating limited evidence of sustained recent work.
Breadth · 48/100
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for praneethpike. The portfolio spans JavaScript, Ruby, Swift, and projects with unknown languages, covering web, app, design, and prototype-oriented names.
Community · 50/100
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for praneethpike. Community evidence is unavailable or minimal beyond one follower and zero listed stars; this is treated as neutral rather than negative.
- Raw total
- 34.80
- Top-end curve
- +0.00
- Final overall
- 34.8
Tier thresholds
S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist
I. How this saved profile rating was produced
- 01
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
- 02
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
- 03
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
- 04
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
- 05
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3
II. Data sources & caveats
- Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
- Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
- Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
- Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
- Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 1:07 AM UTC and is marked aging.