forecast
Forecasting forecast
A repository literally devoted to forecast has become the portfolio's own long-range forecast: apparently still pointing toward more forecasting, years later.
Profiles, repos, scores & roasts
Ship machine
silver medal
Overall
0.0/ 100
forecast
A repository literally devoted to forecast has become the portfolio's own long-range forecast: apparently still pointing toward more forecasting, years later.
weird
Most portfolios hide their weird experiments in a basement; this one gives the experiment a sign, a web address, and regular maintenance.
Repository binding unavailable
The forecasting textbook ecosystem seems determined to turn every chapter into an R-shaped object, leaving no equation uncompiled in spirit.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
A frequently refreshed CV repository treats professional history like a living software artifact: edit, rebuild, repeat, and never ship the final version.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Repository binding unavailable
While other projects chase grand models, this small TeX repository handles the scholarly plumbing—the quiet hero keeping the citation machinery from spilling onto the floor.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Impact
25% weight
The portfolio is strongly coherent around forecasting, statistical learning, and related educational or research materials. Several named projects appear substantial and useful, but implementation evidence is unavailable.
Consistency
15% weight
The supplied repositories show activity extending through 2026, with many updates in 2026 and a long profile history since 2009. This supports unusually sustained ownership, though contribution totals and detailed history are unavailable.
Quality
25% weight
Multiple maintained, non-fork repositories and dedicated project, slide, website, CV, and publication-related repositories provide positive maturity signals. Source, tests, CI, documentation, and licensing cannot be assessed.
Depth
20% weight
The long-running forecast ecosystem, fpp3 materials, hdrcde, and m4metalearning indicate sustained ownership across substantial subject-matter projects, with continued recent activity in several repositories.
Breadth
10% weight
The listed work spans R, HTML, and TeX, and includes software, educational materials, presentations, personal web content, and scholarly workflow artifacts. The thematic focus is concentrated rather than broadly cross-domain.
Community
5% weight
Follower and star evidence is available as a weak positive tie-breaker, including notable attention for forecast and related projects. Community signals do not determine the other scores, and unavailable adoption details remain neutral.
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Non-fork sample
12
Last 12 months
2809
Accepted fact
3112
Profile date
Sep 2009
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
robjhyndman /
92/100
A long-running, actively updated R forecasting project with a clear, high-utility domain focus and substantial visible community interest.
robjhyndman /
86/100
An actively updated R repository tied to a substantial forecasting text or teaching ecosystem, with strong educational and analytical coherence.
robjhyndman /
78/100
A focused R repository for metalearning in forecasting, indicating ambitious research-oriented scope and sustained scholarly relevance despite older listed activity.
robjhyndman /
73/100
A slide-focused R repository supporting the forecasting education ecosystem, with clear presentation value and ongoing though less recent activity.
robjhyndman /
72/100
A maintained R project in a specialized statistical domain, suggesting meaningful technical subject matter and sustained ownership.
robjhyndman /
68/100
An actively updated R project with an intriguing specialized premise; the available metadata supports originality and continuity but not implementation depth.
robjhyndman /
64/100
A frequently updated TeX CV repository, showing disciplined maintenance of an important scholarly artifact rather than a large software system.
robjhyndman /
62/100
An actively maintained HTML personal website repository, representing useful public-facing project work though its technical scope is unavailable.
robjhyndman /
58/100
A recently updated R repository centered on a talk or analysis topic, combining timely activity with a narrower apparent scope.
robjhyndman /
55/100
A recently updated HTML dashboard project, suggesting a maintained presentation or monitoring surface; its implementation scope is unknown.
robjhyndman /
49/100
A recently updated TeX repository associated with a specialized theoretical topic, showing active scholarly work with limited scope inferable from metadata.
robjhyndman /
48/100
A recently updated TeX repository for a literature or reference-management workflow, useful but apparently narrower in scope.
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 91 | 22.75 |
| Quality | 25% | 72 | 18.00 |
| Depth | 20% | 89 | 17.80 |
| Consistency | 15% | 88 | 13.20 |
| Breadth | 10% | 67 | 6.70 |
| Community | 5% | 54 | 2.70 |
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for robjhyndman. The portfolio is strongly coherent around forecasting, statistical learning, and related educational or research materials. Several named projects appear substantial and useful, but implementation evidence is unavailable.
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for robjhyndman. Multiple maintained, non-fork repositories and dedicated project, slide, website, CV, and publication-related repositories provide positive maturity signals. Source, tests, CI, documentation, and licensing cannot be assessed.
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for robjhyndman. The long-running forecast ecosystem, fpp3 materials, hdrcde, and m4metalearning indicate sustained ownership across substantial subject-matter projects, with continued recent activity in several repositories.
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for robjhyndman. The supplied repositories show activity extending through 2026, with many updates in 2026 and a long profile history since 2009. This supports unusually sustained ownership, though contribution totals and detailed history are unavailable.
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for robjhyndman. The listed work spans R, HTML, and TeX, and includes software, educational materials, presentations, personal web content, and scholarly workflow artifacts. The thematic focus is concentrated rather than broadly cross-domain.
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for robjhyndman. Follower and star evidence is available as a weak positive tie-breaker, including notable attention for forecast and related projects. Community signals do not determine the other scores, and unavailable adoption details remain neutral.
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3