Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
robjhyndman GitHub avatar

#15 · Top 98.6%

robjhyndman

Rob J Hyndman

Professor of Statistics at Monash University, Australia

A

Ship machine

silver medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Repository binding unavailable

Book, but make it executable

The forecasting textbook ecosystem seems determined to turn every chapter into an R-shaped object, leaving no equation uncompiled in spirit.

Historical result · no repository binding was retained

Repository binding unavailable

Curriculum vitae continuous integration

A frequently refreshed CV repository treats professional history like a living software artifact: edit, rebuild, repeat, and never ship the final version.

Historical result · no repository binding was retained

Repository binding unavailable

Bibliography infrastructure

While other projects chase grand models, this small TeX repository handles the scholarly plumbing—the quiet hero keeping the citation machinery from spilling onto the floor.

Historical result · no repository binding was retained

Category breakdown

robjhyndman category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

91S

The portfolio is strongly coherent around forecasting, statistical learning, and related educational or research materials. Several named projects appear substantial and useful, but implementation evidence is unavailable.

Consistency

15% weight

88A

The supplied repositories show activity extending through 2026, with many updates in 2026 and a long profile history since 2009. This supports unusually sustained ownership, though contribution totals and detailed history are unavailable.

Quality

25% weight

72B

Multiple maintained, non-fork repositories and dedicated project, slide, website, CV, and publication-related repositories provide positive maturity signals. Source, tests, CI, documentation, and licensing cannot be assessed.

Depth

20% weight

89A

The long-running forecast ecosystem, fpp3 materials, hdrcde, and m4metalearning indicate sustained ownership across substantial subject-matter projects, with continued recent activity in several repositories.

Breadth

10% weight

67C

The listed work spans R, HTML, and TeX, and includes software, educational materials, presentations, personal web content, and scholarly workflow artifacts. The thematic focus is concentrated rather than broadly cross-domain.

Community

5% weight

54D

Follower and star evidence is available as a weak positive tie-breaker, including notable attention for forecast and related projects. Community signals do not determine the other scores, and unavailable adoption details remain neutral.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

342 active days

Language distribution

  • R58%
  • TeX25%
  • HTML17%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

12

Commits

Last 12 months

2809

Followers

Accepted fact

3112

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Sep 2009

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created robjhyndman/forecast - Forecasting Functions for Time Series and Linear Models
  3. Created robjhyndman/hdrcde - Highest density regions and conditional density estimation
  4. Created robjhyndman/cv - RJH Curriculum Vitae
  5. Created robjhyndman/m4metalearning
  6. Created robjhyndman/fpp3
  7. Created robjhyndman/weird
  8. Created robjhyndman/robjhyndman.com - Quarto source files for robjhyndman.com
  9. Created robjhyndman/fpp3_slides - Slides to accompany Forecasting: Principles and Practice, 3rd edition
  10. Created robjhyndman/paperpile
  11. Created robjhyndman/gh-dashboard
  12. Created robjhyndman/surprisal_theory
  13. Created robjhyndman/surprisal_talk - Talk on anomaly detection using surprisals
  14. Most recent push to robjhyndman/gh-dashboard

Compare

ROBJHYNDMAN · 6DMEDIAN CODER

ROBJHYNDMAN compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%9122.75
Quality25%7218.00
Depth20%8917.80
Consistency15%8813.20
Breadth10%676.70
Community5%542.70
Impact · 91/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for robjhyndman. The portfolio is strongly coherent around forecasting, statistical learning, and related educational or research materials. Several named projects appear substantial and useful, but implementation evidence is unavailable.

Quality · 72/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for robjhyndman. Multiple maintained, non-fork repositories and dedicated project, slide, website, CV, and publication-related repositories provide positive maturity signals. Source, tests, CI, documentation, and licensing cannot be assessed.

Depth · 89/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for robjhyndman. The long-running forecast ecosystem, fpp3 materials, hdrcde, and m4metalearning indicate sustained ownership across substantial subject-matter projects, with continued recent activity in several repositories.

Consistency · 88/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for robjhyndman. The supplied repositories show activity extending through 2026, with many updates in 2026 and a long profile history since 2009. This supports unusually sustained ownership, though contribution totals and detailed history are unavailable.

Breadth · 67/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for robjhyndman. The listed work spans R, HTML, and TeX, and includes software, educational materials, presentations, personal web content, and scholarly workflow artifacts. The thematic focus is concentrated rather than broadly cross-domain.

Community · 54/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for robjhyndman. Follower and star evidence is available as a weak positive tie-breaker, including notable attention for forecast and related projects. Community signals do not determine the other scores, and unavailable adoption details remain neutral.

Raw total
81.15
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
81.2

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 1:19 AM UTC and is marked aging.