Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
seblague GitHub avatar

#14 · Top 98.7%

seblague

Sebastian Lague

A

Ship machine

silver medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

seblague category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

89A

The portfolio centers on ambitious interactive and simulation-oriented projects—digital logic, geography, procedural planets, erosion, path creation, chess, clouds, portals, and a solar system—indicating strong usefulness and distinctive,.

Consistency

15% weight

86A

The supplied repositories show repeated non-fork activity from 2019 through 2026, with many substantive projects updated in 2024 and 2025. The visible portfolio is consistently active, though the evidence does not establish the cadence or内容

Quality

25% weight

78B

Project naming, non-fork status, continued updates, and substantial apparent scope provide positive maturity signals. Source, tests, CI, documentation, and implementation quality are unavailable, so the score remains below the exceptional—

Depth

20% weight

84A

The portfolio shows sustained ownership across multiple years and several projects with substantial apparent scope, including logic simulation, terrain and erosion, procedural worlds, and interactive adventures. Metadata cannot establish内部

Breadth

10% weight

67C

The listed work spans simulations, games, procedural generation, visualization, and tools, but is heavily concentrated in C# with one GDScript project. That is meaningful project variety with moderate language variety.

Community

5% weight

62C

Community evidence is a weak positive tie-breaker here: the profile has many followers and the listed projects have visible stars, but popularity does not raise the other categories and cannot substitute for unavailable implementation—

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

283 active days

Language distribution

  • C#84%
  • GDScript8%
  • Unknown8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

12

Commits

Last 12 months

26

Followers

Accepted fact

24307

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Apr 2013

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created seblague/procedural-planets
  3. Created seblague/path-creator - Path creation asset for Unity game development
  4. Created seblague/hydraulic-erosion
  5. Created seblague/boids
  6. Created seblague/clouds - Cloud rendering test
  7. Created seblague/portals - Portals in Unity
  8. Created seblague/solar-system - Simple solar system experiment
  9. Created seblague/digital-logic-sim
  10. Created seblague/chess-coding-adventure - A work-in-progress chess bot written in C#
  11. Created seblague/geographical-adventures
  12. Created seblague/misc-project-info
  13. Created seblague/godot-marching-cubes
  14. Most recent push to seblague/misc-project-info

Compare

SEBLAGUE · 6DMEDIAN CODER

SEBLAGUE compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%8922.25
Quality25%7819.50
Depth20%8416.80
Consistency15%8612.90
Breadth10%676.70
Community5%623.10
Impact · 89/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for seblague. The portfolio centers on ambitious interactive and simulation-oriented projects—digital logic, geography, procedural planets, erosion, path creation, chess, clouds, portals, and a solar system—indicating strong usefulness and distinctive,.

Quality · 78/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for seblague. Project naming, non-fork status, continued updates, and substantial apparent scope provide positive maturity signals. Source, tests, CI, documentation, and implementation quality are unavailable, so the score remains below the exceptional—

Depth · 84/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for seblague. The portfolio shows sustained ownership across multiple years and several projects with substantial apparent scope, including logic simulation, terrain and erosion, procedural worlds, and interactive adventures. Metadata cannot establish内部

Consistency · 86/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for seblague. The supplied repositories show repeated non-fork activity from 2019 through 2026, with many substantive projects updated in 2024 and 2025. The visible portfolio is consistently active, though the evidence does not establish the cadence or内容

Breadth · 67/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for seblague. The listed work spans simulations, games, procedural generation, visualization, and tools, but is heavily concentrated in C# with one GDScript project. That is meaningful project variety with moderate language variety.

Community · 62/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for seblague. Community evidence is a weak positive tie-breaker here: the profile has many followers and the listed projects have visible stars, but popularity does not raise the other categories and cannot substitute for unavailable implementation—

Raw total
81.25
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
81.3

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 1:31 AM UTC and is marked aging.