Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
shamlymackey GitHub avatar

#1058 · Top 3.4%

shamlymackey

Shamly Mackey

☁️ Self-hosting addict | 🧠 AI tinkerer | 🌱 Farm tech dreamer. If it runs in Docker, it’s probably on my NAS.

F

GitHub tourist

red alert

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

shamlymackey category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

32F

There is some potentially useful project variety, including an app-related repository, demos, frontend work, and Java projects, but most repositories are forks or broadly named starter-style projects, limiting evidence of distinctive impact

Consistency

15% weight

35F

The portfolio shows activity across 2016–2025, including recent pushes, but the supplied metadata does not establish sustained contribution patterns or continuity of ownership.

Quality

25% weight

38F

Metadata supports some language and project-structure signals, but does not provide source, tests, CI, documentation, or other direct engineering-maturity evidence. The relatively high fork share further limits confident assessment of owned

Depth

20% weight

30F

The profile contains 11 repositories, but 6 are marked as forks and the available metadata does not show sustained scope, release history, maintenance intensity, or implementation ownership.

Breadth

10% weight

48D

The portfolio spans Python, SCSS, Java, HTML, JavaScript, and repositories with unknown languages, covering demos, frontend, application, and educational or contribution-oriented projects.

Community

5% weight

50D

Community evidence is unavailable beyond six followers and zero listed stars; under the rubric this is treated as a neutral tie-breaker rather than a penalty.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

79 active days

Language distribution

  • Unknown37%
  • Java27%
  • HTML9%
  • JavaScript9%
  • Python9%
  • SCSS9%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

5

Commits

Last 12 months

0

Followers

Accepted fact

6

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Jun 2014

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created shamlymackey/codingstandardsmackey
  3. Created shamlymackey/hsenidservlet
  4. Created shamlymackey/first-contributions - 🚀 Yet another project to get beginners contributing to open source 🔰
  5. Created shamlymackey/teammates - This is the project website for the TEAMMATES feedback management tool for education
  6. Created shamlymackey/jterm - A terminal written in Java for cross-platform compatibility and usage.
  7. Created shamlymackey/hello-world - Testing out git-it
  8. Created shamlymackey/patchwork - All the Git-it Workshop completers!
  9. Created shamlymackey/react-native-design - Testing app designs
  10. Created shamlymackey/about - About Shamly Mackey
  11. Created shamlymackey/rmf_demos - Demonstrations of the Open-RMF
  12. Most recent push to shamlymackey/appflowy-cloud-0.9.64
  13. Created shamlymackey/appflowy-cloud-0.9.64 - Bring projects, wikis, and teams together with AI. AppFlowy is the AI collaborative workspace where you achieve more without losing control of your data. The leading open source Notion alternativ

Compare

SHAMLYMACKEY · 6DMEDIAN CODER

SHAMLYMACKEY compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%328.00
Quality25%389.50
Depth20%306.00
Consistency15%355.25
Breadth10%484.80
Community5%502.50
Impact · 32/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for shamlymackey. There is some potentially useful project variety, including an app-related repository, demos, frontend work, and Java projects, but most repositories are forks or broadly named starter-style projects, limiting evidence of distinctive impact

Quality · 38/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for shamlymackey. Metadata supports some language and project-structure signals, but does not provide source, tests, CI, documentation, or other direct engineering-maturity evidence. The relatively high fork share further limits confident assessment of owned

Depth · 30/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for shamlymackey. The profile contains 11 repositories, but 6 are marked as forks and the available metadata does not show sustained scope, release history, maintenance intensity, or implementation ownership.

Consistency · 35/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for shamlymackey. The portfolio shows activity across 2016–2025, including recent pushes, but the supplied metadata does not establish sustained contribution patterns or continuity of ownership.

Breadth · 48/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for shamlymackey. The portfolio spans Python, SCSS, Java, HTML, JavaScript, and repositories with unknown languages, covering demos, frontend, application, and educational or contribution-oriented projects.

Community · 50/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for shamlymackey. Community evidence is unavailable beyond six followers and zero listed stars; under the rubric this is treated as a neutral tie-breaker rather than a penalty.

Raw total
36.05
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
36.1

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 1:32 AM UTC and is marked aging.