Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
sindresorhus GitHub avatar

#1 · Top 99.9%

sindresorhus

Sindre Sorhus

Full-Time Open-Sourcerer. Focused on Swift & JavaScript. Makes macOS apps, CLI tools, npm packages.

S

Mass-producing humans

gold crown

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

sindresorhus category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

98S

The portfolio includes widely useful JavaScript and TypeScript tooling, developer resources, platform utilities, and large curated lists, indicating exceptional usefulness and coherence.

Consistency

15% weight

96S

The supplied repositories show activity spanning 2025 and 2026, alongside a profile dating back to 2009 and an unusually large owned-repository portfolio.

Quality

25% weight

88A

Repository names, descriptions, languages, ownership, non-fork status, non-archived status, and sustained update dates provide strong maturity signals, though implementation quality cannot be assessed from the available metadata.

Depth

20% weight

95S

The combination of a long-running profile, 1,141 public repositories, repeated maintenance, and several substantial named projects supports unusually sustained ownership and scope.

Breadth

10% weight

93S

The sample spans JavaScript, TypeScript, documentation or curation projects, developer tooling, Electron, macOS utilities, web capture, and science-fiction curation.

Community

5% weight

96S

Follower and star counts provide strong positive community evidence as a tie-breaker; popularity is not used to inflate the other categories.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

319 active days

Language distribution

  • Unknown58%
  • JavaScript25%
  • TypeScript17%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

12

Commits

Last 12 months

3626

Followers

Accepted fact

80961

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Dec 2009

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created sindresorhus/quick-look-plugins - List of useful Quick Look plugins for developers
  3. Created sindresorhus/awesome - 😎 Awesome lists about all kinds of interesting topics
  4. Created sindresorhus/awesome-nodejs - :zap: Delightful Node.js packages and resources [BECAUSE OF TOO MUCH SPAM AND LOW-QUALITY SUBMISSIONS, SUBMISSIONS ARE PAUSED UNTIL JULY]
  5. Created sindresorhus/awesome-scifi - Sci-Fi worth consuming
  6. Created sindresorhus/awesome-electron - Useful resources for creating apps with Electron [SUBMISSIONS ARE TEMPORARILY PAUSED BECAUSE I'M TIRED OF REVIEWING LOW-QUALITY STUFF]
  7. Created sindresorhus/eslint-plugin-unicorn - More than 300 powerful ESLint rules
  8. Created sindresorhus/electron-store - Simple data persistence for your Electron app or module - Save and load user preferences, app state, cache, etc
  9. Created sindresorhus/p-queue - Promise queue with concurrency control
  10. Created sindresorhus/capture-website - Capture screenshots of websites
  11. Created sindresorhus/type-fest - A collection of essential TypeScript types
  12. Created sindresorhus/actions - ⚙️ Supercharge your shortcuts
  13. Created sindresorhus/supercharge-meta
  14. Most recent push to sindresorhus/eslint-plugin-unicorn

Compare

SINDRESORHUS · 6DMEDIAN CODER

SINDRESORHUS compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%9824.50
Quality25%8822.00
Depth20%9519.00
Consistency15%9614.40
Breadth10%939.30
Community5%964.80
Impact · 98/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for sindresorhus. The portfolio includes widely useful JavaScript and TypeScript tooling, developer resources, platform utilities, and large curated lists, indicating exceptional usefulness and coherence.

Quality · 88/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for sindresorhus. Repository names, descriptions, languages, ownership, non-fork status, non-archived status, and sustained update dates provide strong maturity signals, though implementation quality cannot be assessed from the available metadata.

Depth · 95/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for sindresorhus. The combination of a long-running profile, 1,141 public repositories, repeated maintenance, and several substantial named projects supports unusually sustained ownership and scope.

Consistency · 96/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for sindresorhus. The supplied repositories show activity spanning 2025 and 2026, alongside a profile dating back to 2009 and an unusually large owned-repository portfolio.

Breadth · 93/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for sindresorhus. The sample spans JavaScript, TypeScript, documentation or curation projects, developer tooling, Electron, macOS utilities, web capture, and science-fiction curation.

Community · 96/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for sindresorhus. Follower and star counts provide strong positive community evidence as a tie-breaker; popularity is not used to inflate the other categories.

Raw total
94.00
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
94.0

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 1:38 AM UTC and is marked aging.