Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
siriusmart GitHub avatar

#35 · Top 96.8%

siriusmart

Sirius

the worst she can say is segmentation fault (core dumped)

B

Solid engineer

bronze medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

siriusmart category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

78B

The portfolio includes a distinctive Rust terminal application with substantial apparent adoption, alongside tools, documentation systems, and experimental projects with coherent technical ambition.

Consistency

15% weight

88A

The supplied repositories show a dense pattern of recent updates across multiple projects, indicating sustained current activity.

Quality

25% weight

63C

The available metadata indicates varied languages, project types, and non-fork ownership, supporting a positive but limited assessment of engineering maturity; implementation details cannot be assessed from the supplied metadata.

Depth

20% weight

81A

Multiple owned projects are actively updated, including several Rust and TypeScript projects; the portfolio suggests sustained ownership, though implementation scope cannot be verified from metadata alone.

Breadth

10% weight

76B

The portfolio spans Rust, TypeScript, HTML, terminal software, documentation tooling, web projects, graph-oriented task tooling, and experimental or educational work.

Community

5% weight

52D

Community evidence is limited and mixed: one repository has notable stars and the profile has followers, while most repositories have no visible stars. This is treated only as a weak positive tie-breaker.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

252 active days

Language distribution

  • TypeScript42%
  • Rust33%
  • HTML17%
  • Unknown8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

10

Commits

Last 12 months

1282

Followers

Accepted fact

46

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Sep 2020

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created siriusmart/youtube-tui - An aesthetically pleasing YouTube TUI written in Rust
  3. Created siriusmart/wp-dir-toc
  4. Created siriusmart/wp-vitepress-doc
  5. Created siriusmart/wp-vitepress-resources
  6. Created siriusmart/mechanics-of-proof-solutions - Lecture notes for a course on writing proofs, on paper and in the Lean proof assistant
  7. Created siriusmart/pseudoer - Pseudocode world championship
  8. Created siriusmart/element-web - A glossy Matrix collaboration client for the web.
  9. Created siriusmart/task-dag-rs - Task tracking DAG
  10. Created siriusmart/daydream
  11. Created siriusmart/geowhat - Geoguessr analysis tool
  12. Created siriusmart/webpan.siri.ws - webpan main site
  13. Created siriusmart/wunified-rehype-mermaid - rehype-mermaid force different processors to use the same playwright instance
  14. Most recent push to siriusmart/wp-vitepress-resources

Compare

SIRIUSMART · 6DMEDIAN CODER

SIRIUSMART compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%7819.50
Quality25%6315.75
Depth20%8116.20
Consistency15%8813.20
Breadth10%767.60
Community5%522.60
Impact · 78/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for siriusmart. The portfolio includes a distinctive Rust terminal application with substantial apparent adoption, alongside tools, documentation systems, and experimental projects with coherent technical ambition.

Quality · 63/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for siriusmart. The available metadata indicates varied languages, project types, and non-fork ownership, supporting a positive but limited assessment of engineering maturity; implementation details cannot be assessed from the supplied metadata.

Depth · 81/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for siriusmart. Multiple owned projects are actively updated, including several Rust and TypeScript projects; the portfolio suggests sustained ownership, though implementation scope cannot be verified from metadata alone.

Consistency · 88/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for siriusmart. The supplied repositories show a dense pattern of recent updates across multiple projects, indicating sustained current activity.

Breadth · 76/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for siriusmart. The portfolio spans Rust, TypeScript, HTML, terminal software, documentation tooling, web projects, graph-oriented task tooling, and experimental or educational work.

Community · 52/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for siriusmart. Community evidence is limited and mixed: one repository has notable stars and the profile has followers, while most repositories have no visible stars. This is treated only as a weak positive tie-breaker.

Raw total
74.85
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
74.9

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 1:39 AM UTC and is marked aging.