markup_day
Markup marathon
markup_day is the portfolio’s freshest signal: a TypeScript project arriving recently enough to suggest the day is still in progress, even if the supplied metadata leaves the finish line mysterious.
Roasts
config_niks
Configuration déjà vu
config_niks sounds like it wants to organize the universe, but being a fork makes it more “carefully inherited chaos” than a clearly original act of configuration wizardry.
soumyadip69
The quiet archive
soumyadip69 has the grandest possible repository name and a 2022 timestamp, giving the portfolio a tiny museum wing dedicated to a project whose exhibit description is still unknown.
Repository binding unavailable
Three-repo ensemble
Together, these repositories form an intriguing band: TypeScript on lead vocals, an unknown-language fork on backup, and a quiet older project handling the atmospheric interlude.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Category breakdown
Impact
25% weight
The metadata shows limited evidence of ambitious, distinctive, or broadly useful work; project names and languages alone do not establish stronger impact.
Consistency
15% weight
The profile has three public repositories, but the supplied activity is concentrated in one recent TypeScript repository while another was last pushed in 2024 and the remaining repository in 2022.
Quality
25% weight
One non-fork TypeScript repository is active and two repositories have no supplied language information, providing only modest maturity signals without source, tests, documentation, or CI evidence.
Depth
20% weight
There are three repositories and at least one apparently owned, recently updated project, but the supplied history does not show sustained scope, maintenance across projects, or implementation depth.
Breadth
10% weight
The portfolio contains a TypeScript project plus repositories with unknown languages, but the available metadata does not demonstrate meaningful language or project-type variety.
Community
5% weight
Community evidence is limited to one follower and zero stars, which is treated as neutral rather than penalizing; the available data does not provide a strong positive community signal.
Stats
52-week commit heatmap
2 active daysLanguage distribution
2 langs
- Unknown67%
- TypeScript33%
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Numbers
Owned repos
Non-fork sample
2
Commits
Last 12 months
2
Followers
Accepted fact
1
Joined GitHub
Profile date
Mar 2021
Top repos
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
soumyadip69 /
markup_day
40/100
An apparently owned, non-archived TypeScript repository with a very recent push; the metadata supports active project ownership but does not reveal scope, maturity, or implementation quality.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingTypeScript
★ 0 · 1d agoOpen on GitHub ↗
soumyadip69 /
soumyadip69
24/100
An owned, non-archived repository with unknown language and a 2022 push; its age and limited metadata provide only modest evidence of a maintained or substantial project.
OwnedActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 0 · 5y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
soumyadip69 /
config_niks
22/100
A non-archived fork with unknown language and a 2024 push; it contributes some portfolio activity but offers limited evidence of original ownership or distinctive substance.
ForkActiveProfile ratingUnknown
★ 0 · 2y agoOpen on GitHub ↗
Timeline
- Joined GitHub
- Created soumyadip69/soumyadip69 - Config files for my GitHub profile.
- Created soumyadip69/config_niks
- Created soumyadip69/markup_day
- Most recent push to soumyadip69/markup_day
Compare
SOUMYADIP69 · 6DMEDIAN CODER
Rubric
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 27 | 6.75 |
| Quality | 25% | 31 | 7.75 |
| Depth | 20% | 25 | 5.00 |
| Consistency | 15% | 29 | 4.35 |
| Breadth | 10% | 22 | 2.20 |
| Community | 5% | 50 | 2.50 |
Impact · 27/100
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for soumyadip69. The metadata shows limited evidence of ambitious, distinctive, or broadly useful work; project names and languages alone do not establish stronger impact.
Quality · 31/100
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for soumyadip69. One non-fork TypeScript repository is active and two repositories have no supplied language information, providing only modest maturity signals without source, tests, documentation, or CI evidence.
Depth · 25/100
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for soumyadip69. There are three repositories and at least one apparently owned, recently updated project, but the supplied history does not show sustained scope, maintenance across projects, or implementation depth.
Consistency · 29/100
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for soumyadip69. The profile has three public repositories, but the supplied activity is concentrated in one recent TypeScript repository while another was last pushed in 2024 and the remaining repository in 2022.
Breadth · 22/100
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for soumyadip69. The portfolio contains a TypeScript project plus repositories with unknown languages, but the available metadata does not demonstrate meaningful language or project-type variety.
Community · 50/100
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for soumyadip69. Community evidence is limited to one follower and zero stars, which is treated as neutral rather than penalizing; the available data does not provide a strong positive community signal.
- Raw total
- 28.55
- Top-end curve
- +0.00
- Final overall
- 28.6
Tier thresholds
S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist
I. How this saved profile rating was produced
- 01
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
- 02
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
- 03
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
- 04
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
- 05
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3
II. Data sources & caveats
- Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
- Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
- Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
- Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
- Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 1:42 AM UTC and is marked aging.