Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
steipete GitHub avatar

#6 · Top 99.5%

steipete

Peter Steinberger

Came back from retirement to mess with AI. Clawdfather @OpenClaw Previously: Founder of @PSPDFKit.

A

Ship machine

silver medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

steipete category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

91S

The portfolio centers on practical developer tools, automation, macOS utilities, agent tooling, and content processing, with several projects showing substantial public interest and a coherent product focus.

Consistency

15% weight

94S

The supplied repositories show an unusually dense pattern of recent updates, with nearly every listed project pushed in August 2026 and a long-standing public profile.

Quality

25% weight

79B

Non-fork, non-archived status across nearly all listed repositories and sustained updates are positive maturity signals, though implementation quality, testing, documentation, and release practices are unavailable.

Depth

20% weight

88A

The profile contains many distinct owned repositories, repeated maintenance activity, and multiple projects with meaningful scope and continued development; exact implementation depth cannot be verified from metadata alone.

Breadth

10% weight

84A

The listed work spans TypeScript, Swift, Shell, Astro, and Ruby, covering desktop utilities, automation, agent tooling, web publishing, text processing, and package distribution.

Community

5% weight

96S

The profile has substantial follower and repository-star signals, including several highly visible projects. These are used only as a weak community tie-breaker and not as evidence of engineering quality.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

355 active days

Language distribution

  • TypeScript42%
  • Swift25%
  • Shell17%
  • Astro8%
  • Ruby8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

12

Commits

Last 12 months

67785

Followers

Accepted fact

52676

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Feb 2009

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created steipete/steipete.me - My personal website.
  3. Created steipete/macos-automator-mcp - An MCP server to run AppleScript and JXA (JavaScript for Automation) to macOS.
  4. Created steipete/demark
  5. Created steipete/agent-rules - Rules and Knowledge to work better with agents such as Claude Code or Cursor
  6. Created steipete/homebrew-tap - Homebrew tap for steipete's tools
  7. Created steipete/sweetlink - Connect your agent to your web app. Like playwright, but works in your current tab. Close the loop.
  8. Created steipete/agent-scripts - Scripts for agents, shared between my repositories.
  9. Created steipete/oracle - Ask the oracle when you're stuck. Invoke GPT-5 Pro with a custom context and files.
  10. Created steipete/codexbar - Show usage stats for OpenAI Codex and Claude Code, without having to login.
  11. Created steipete/repobar - Show status of GitHub Repos right in your menu bar and terminal: CI, Issues, Pull Requests, Latest Release.
  12. Created steipete/vox - Let's your agent run phone calls
  13. Created steipete/summarize - Point at any URL/YouTube/Podcast or file. Get the gist. CLI and Chrome Extension.
  14. Most recent push to steipete/summarize

Compare

STEIPETE · 6DMEDIAN CODER

STEIPETE compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%9122.75
Quality25%7919.75
Depth20%8817.60
Consistency15%9414.10
Breadth10%848.40
Community5%964.80
Impact · 91/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for steipete. The portfolio centers on practical developer tools, automation, macOS utilities, agent tooling, and content processing, with several projects showing substantial public interest and a coherent product focus.

Quality · 79/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for steipete. Non-fork, non-archived status across nearly all listed repositories and sustained updates are positive maturity signals, though implementation quality, testing, documentation, and release practices are unavailable.

Depth · 88/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for steipete. The profile contains many distinct owned repositories, repeated maintenance activity, and multiple projects with meaningful scope and continued development; exact implementation depth cannot be verified from metadata alone.

Consistency · 94/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for steipete. The supplied repositories show an unusually dense pattern of recent updates, with nearly every listed project pushed in August 2026 and a long-standing public profile.

Breadth · 84/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for steipete. The listed work spans TypeScript, Swift, Shell, Astro, and Ruby, covering desktop utilities, automation, agent tooling, web publishing, text processing, and package distribution.

Community · 96/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for steipete. The profile has substantial follower and repository-star signals, including several highly visible projects. These are used only as a weak community tie-breaker and not as evidence of engineering quality.

Raw total
87.40
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
87.4

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 1:44 AM UTC and is marked aging.