demotools
The toolbox that became a workshop
demotools sounds like a tidy little utility drawer, but its sustained updates and broad demographic flavor suggest the drawer has quietly expanded into an entire workshop.
Profiles, repos, scores & roasts
#31 · Top 97.2%
Tim Riffe
A philosopher, trapped in a programmer's body, with a penchant for demography: data, demography, danger.
Solid engineer
bronze medal
Overall
0.0/ 100
demotools
demotools sounds like a tidy little utility drawer, but its sustained updates and broad demographic flavor suggest the drawer has quietly expanded into an entire workshop.
demodecomp
demodecomp takes the bold stance that one demographic answer is never enough, then keeps splitting the question until the spreadsheet starts asking for its own decomposition.
decomp_sullivan
decomp_sullivan has the wonderfully specific energy of a repository created after one method refused to leave the research agenda alone.
hmdhfdplus
hmdhfdplus sounds like the sequel where mortality data returns with bonus health and frailty content, proving even grim statistics can get an expansion pack.
ddsqltools
ddsqltools is the crossover episode: demographic analysis meets SQL, presumably so the data can be queried before it gets decomposed again.
Impact
25% weight
The projects form a coherent, specialized body of demographic, mortality, decomposition, inequality, and coverage work, suggesting substantial practical and research value.
Consistency
15% weight
The visible portfolio shows sustained activity across many years, with numerous repositories updated in 2025-2026 and several active, non-fork projects.
Quality
25% weight
Repository names, non-fork ownership, active status, and repeated domain-specific tooling signal mature project intent, though implementation quality cannot be assessed from metadata alone.
Depth
20% weight
The long-running profile, specialized tool repositories, and continued work across related analytical projects indicate sustained ownership and meaningful domain depth.
Breadth
10% weight
The supplied repositories are overwhelmingly R-based and concentrated in demography and population analysis, giving strong thematic variety but limited language and project-type variety.
Community
5% weight
Follower and star counts provide a modest positive signal, especially for demotools, but community evidence is limited and does not materially drive the other scores.
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Non-fork sample
11
Last 12 months
330
Accepted fact
269
Profile date
Jul 2011
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
timriffe /
78/100
A substantial, actively maintained R toolkit with the strongest visible community signal among the listed repositories.
timriffe /
68/100
An actively updated R project focused on demographic decomposition, indicating specialized analytical scope.
timriffe /
67/100
A recently updated R project concerning human mortality and health or frailty data, suggesting specialized applied analysis.
timriffe /
64/100
A current R repository focused on Sullivan decomposition, reflecting specialized methodological work.
timriffe /
62/100
A recently updated R project centered on income or incidence demography, showing ongoing domain work.
timriffe /
61/100
An active R project concerning mortality or survival distributions, with a focused technical premise.
timriffe /
60/100
An R SQL-tools repository with a practical data-management orientation and a longer maintenance history.
timriffe /
58/100
A recently updated R module repository with an apparent educational or instructional focus.
timriffe /
56/100
A recent R repository whose name suggests an AVSP-related module or analysis, but metadata gives limited detail.
timriffe /
55/100
An R repository tied to a 2021 PhD-related project, with a clear academic focus but no recent update visible.
timriffe /
52/100
An R repository focused on adult coverage, representing a narrower applied demographic topic with older visible activity.
timriffe /
45/100
A forked R repository concerning life inequality; its presence adds topical context, but ownership evidence is weaker than for original projects.
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 82 | 20.50 |
| Quality | 25% | 70 | 17.50 |
| Depth | 20% | 86 | 17.20 |
| Consistency | 15% | 88 | 13.20 |
| Breadth | 10% | 43 | 4.30 |
| Community | 5% | 57 | 2.85 |
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for timriffe. The projects form a coherent, specialized body of demographic, mortality, decomposition, inequality, and coverage work, suggesting substantial practical and research value.
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for timriffe. Repository names, non-fork ownership, active status, and repeated domain-specific tooling signal mature project intent, though implementation quality cannot be assessed from metadata alone.
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for timriffe. The long-running profile, specialized tool repositories, and continued work across related analytical projects indicate sustained ownership and meaningful domain depth.
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for timriffe. The visible portfolio shows sustained activity across many years, with numerous repositories updated in 2025-2026 and several active, non-fork projects.
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for timriffe. The supplied repositories are overwhelmingly R-based and concentrated in demography and population analysis, giving strong thematic variety but limited language and project-type variety.
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for timriffe. Follower and star counts provide a modest positive signal, especially for demotools, but community evidence is limited and does not materially drive the other scores.
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3