Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
torvalds GitHub avatar

#3 · Top 99.7%

torvalds

Linus Torvalds

A

Ship machine

silver medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

torvalds category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

99S

Linux is an exceptionally ambitious and consequential project, while the surrounding tools and experiments suggest a coherent systems-oriented portfolio with several distinctive side projects.

Consistency

15% weight

91S

The portfolio shows repeated activity across several years, including recent pushes to multiple owned repositories, with one older project and a few forks adding some variation.

Quality

25% weight

85A

The repository metadata supports strong maturity signals through substantial, long-lived projects and focused systems work, but source, tests, CI, documentation, and implementation details are unavailable.

Depth

20% weight

98S

The portfolio is anchored by sustained ownership of Linux and supplemented by multiple substantial non-fork projects, with activity continuing across a long time span.

Breadth

10% weight

58D

Most repositories use C and center on systems or hardware-adjacent work, with some C++, OpenSCAD, audio, editor, conversion, and device-oriented variety.

Community

5% weight

86A

The profile has unusually strong visible community reach and several widely recognized repositories; this is used only as a weak positive tie-breaker and does not determine the other scores.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

352 active days

Language distribution

  • C84%
  • C++8%
  • OpenSCAD8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

9

Commits

Last 12 months

3362

Followers

Accepted fact

315690

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Sep 2011

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created torvalds/linux - Linux kernel source tree
  3. Created torvalds/subsurface-for-dirk - Do not use - the real upstream is Subsurface-divelog/subsurface
  4. Created torvalds/libdc-for-dirk - Only use for syncing with Dirk, don't use for anything else
  5. Created torvalds/test-tlb - Stupid memory latency and TLB tester
  6. Created torvalds/pesconvert - Brother PES file converter
  7. Created torvalds/uemacs - Random version of microemacs with my private modificatons
  8. Created torvalds/libgit2 - A cross-platform, linkable library implementation of Git that you can use in your application.
  9. Created torvalds/1590a - Random odd guitar pedal design in kicad
  10. Created torvalds/guitarpedal - Linus learns analog circuits
  11. Created torvalds/audionoise - Random digital audio effects
  12. Created torvalds/hunspellcolorize - Wrapper around 'less' to colorize spelling mistakes using Hunspell
  13. Created torvalds/scrollwheel - Minimalist RP2350 magnetic sensor scroll wheel toy project
  14. Most recent push to torvalds/linux

Compare

TORVALDS · 6DMEDIAN CODER

TORVALDS compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%9924.75
Quality25%8521.25
Depth20%9819.60
Consistency15%9113.65
Breadth10%585.80
Community5%864.30
Impact · 99/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for torvalds. Linux is an exceptionally ambitious and consequential project, while the surrounding tools and experiments suggest a coherent systems-oriented portfolio with several distinctive side projects.

Quality · 85/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for torvalds. The repository metadata supports strong maturity signals through substantial, long-lived projects and focused systems work, but source, tests, CI, documentation, and implementation details are unavailable.

Depth · 98/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for torvalds. The portfolio is anchored by sustained ownership of Linux and supplemented by multiple substantial non-fork projects, with activity continuing across a long time span.

Consistency · 91/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for torvalds. The portfolio shows repeated activity across several years, including recent pushes to multiple owned repositories, with one older project and a few forks adding some variation.

Breadth · 58/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for torvalds. Most repositories use C and center on systems or hardware-adjacent work, with some C++, OpenSCAD, audio, editor, conversion, and device-oriented variety.

Community · 86/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for torvalds. The profile has unusually strong visible community reach and several widely recognized repositories; this is used only as a weak positive tie-breaker and does not determine the other scores.

Raw total
89.35
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
89.4

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 2:01 AM UTC and is marked aging.