Repository binding unavailable
Home automation escalation
You saw a light bulb and answered with a Rust integration that apparently wants to become the household’s entire nervous system.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
Profiles, repos, scores & roasts
Repository binding unavailable
You saw a light bulb and answered with a Rust integration that apparently wants to become the household’s entire nervous system.
Historical result · no repository binding was retained
evremap
evremap suggests that ordinary keyboard layouts were merely a starting point for negotiating a more sophisticated treaty between fingers and operating systems.
atomicparsley
atomicparsley sounds less like a media utility and more like the tool you bring when a file’s metadata refuses to confess.
docker-stack-deploy
docker-stack-deploy takes the classic ‘this deployment should be simple’ premise and gives it a dedicated Rust project, which is either excellent engineering or a very committed way to avoid clicking buttons.
Impact
25% weight
Several owned projects appear practically useful and distinctive, spanning home automation, input remapping, media tooling, deployment, and systems utilities. Repository popularity is not used as the basis for this score.
Consistency
15% weight
The visible portfolio shows repeated activity through 2026, with multiple owned repositories updated across several years. The supplied subset supports sustained activity, though it does not provide complete contribution history or explain.
Quality
25% weight
Metadata indicates multiple substantial, maintained owned projects and several mature-looking domains, but the available public metadata does not establish engineering quality.
Depth
20% weight
The portfolio includes long-lived owned projects with updates from 2022 through 2026, plus multiple projects that appear to address nontrivial practical problems. Exact scope and implementation depth are not available.
Breadth
10% weight
The visible repositories span Rust, C++, Python, Java, home automation, desktop/input tooling, media utilities, deployment, parsing, and systems-oriented projects. Forks are treated as limited evidence of owned breadth.
Community
5% weight
The profile has substantial followers and several repositories have visible stars, providing a weak positive signal of community attention. This category does not affect the other scores.
Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.
Non-fork sample
9
Last 12 months
1699
Accepted fact
3863
Profile date
Aug 2009
Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.
wez /
84/100
A substantially starred, actively maintained Rust home-automation integration, indicating practical utility and sustained ownership.
wez /
80/100
A maintained Rust input-remapping project with substantial visible interest and a focused systems-tooling premise.
wez /
78/100
A long-lived C++ media-related project with substantial visible interest and a recent update, suggesting durable usefulness.
wez /
72/100
A maintained Python home-automation project with meaningful visible interest and a clear practical domain.
wez /
70/100
An actively updated Rust project with a distinctive name and evidence of ongoing ownership; the supplied metadata does not reveal its purpose or implementation scope.
wez /
57/100
An actively updated Rust deployment project with a practical infrastructure-oriented premise, though the metadata alone does not establish its maturity.
wez /
53/100
A Rust project with multi-year continuity and moderate visible interest, providing credible evidence of sustained ownership.
wez /
48/100
A Python project maintained into 2023 with a practical-looking ecosystem relationship, but limited evidence of recent continuation.
wez /
46/100
A Java project with multi-year age and modest visible interest, indicating real but comparatively older portfolio activity.
wez /
35/100
A non-archived Rust fork updated in 2025; it provides limited evidence of original ownership because the metadata identifies it as a fork.
wez /
30/100
A recently updated fork with minimal visible interest; the available metadata supports little inference beyond continued activity.
wez /
25/100
An older Rust fork with no visible stars; it is evidence of repository activity but weak evidence of distinctive owned work.
How this score was produced
Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve
| Category | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | 25% | 82 | 20.50 |
| Quality | 25% | 69 | 17.25 |
| Depth | 20% | 76 | 15.20 |
| Consistency | 15% | 78 | 11.70 |
| Breadth | 10% | 74 | 7.40 |
| Community | 5% | 63 | 3.15 |
What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.
Evidence for wez. Several owned projects appear practically useful and distinctive, spanning home automation, input remapping, media tooling, deployment, and systems utilities. Repository popularity is not used as the basis for this score.
What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.
Evidence for wez. Metadata indicates multiple substantial, maintained owned projects and several mature-looking domains, but the available public metadata does not establish engineering quality.
What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.
Evidence for wez. The portfolio includes long-lived owned projects with updates from 2022 through 2026, plus multiple projects that appear to address nontrivial practical problems. Exact scope and implementation depth are not available.
What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.
Evidence for wez. The visible portfolio shows repeated activity through 2026, with multiple owned repositories updated across several years. The supplied subset supports sustained activity, though it does not provide complete contribution history or explain.
What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.
Evidence for wez. The visible repositories span Rust, C++, Python, Java, home automation, desktop/input tooling, media utilities, deployment, parsing, and systems-oriented projects. Forks are treated as limited evidence of owned breadth.
What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.
Evidence for wez. The profile has substantial followers and several repositories have visible stars, providing a weak positive signal of community attention. This category does not affect the other scores.
Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.
Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.
Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.
Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.
Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.
This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.
Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3