Rate My GitHub

Profiles, repos, scores & roasts

← Rate my GitHub
wez GitHub avatar

#32 · Top 97.1%

wez

Wez Furlong

B

Solid engineer

bronze medal

Overall

0.0

/ 100

Roasts

Category breakdown

wez category score radarImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Impact

25% weight

82A

Several owned projects appear practically useful and distinctive, spanning home automation, input remapping, media tooling, deployment, and systems utilities. Repository popularity is not used as the basis for this score.

Consistency

15% weight

78B

The visible portfolio shows repeated activity through 2026, with multiple owned repositories updated across several years. The supplied subset supports sustained activity, though it does not provide complete contribution history or explain.

Quality

25% weight

69C

Metadata indicates multiple substantial, maintained owned projects and several mature-looking domains, but the available public metadata does not establish engineering quality.

Depth

20% weight

76B

The portfolio includes long-lived owned projects with updates from 2022 through 2026, plus multiple projects that appear to address nontrivial practical problems. Exact scope and implementation depth are not available.

Breadth

10% weight

74B

The visible repositories span Rust, C++, Python, Java, home automation, desktop/input tooling, media utilities, deployment, parsing, and systems-oriented projects. Forks are treated as limited evidence of owned breadth.

Community

5% weight

63C

The profile has substantial followers and several repositories have visible stars, providing a weak positive signal of community attention. This category does not affect the other scores.

Stats

52-week commit heatmap

258 active days

Language distribution

  • Rust50%
  • Python17%
  • Unknown17%
  • C++8%
  • Java8%

Based on the bounded repository sample saved with this analysis.

Numbers

Owned repos

Non-fork sample

9

Commits

Last 12 months

1699

Followers

Accepted fact

3863

Joined GitHub

Profile date

Aug 2009

Top repos

Scores marked Profile rating use bounded public repository metadata. Full repo analysis appears only when a separate accepted repository analysis exists.

Timeline

  1. Joined GitHub
  2. Created wez/jlexphp - A lexer generator for PHP. It is based on JLex and requires Java to generate the lexer. Once generated, the lexer only requires PHP to run.
  3. Created wez/atomicparsley - AtomicParsley is a lightweight command line program for reading, parsing and setting metadata into MPEG-4 files, in particular, iTunes-style metadata.
  4. Created wez/ssh2-rs - Rust bindings for libssh2
  5. Created wez/evremap - A keyboard input remapper for Linux/Wayland systems, written by @wez
  6. Created wez/eledo - Increase or reduce the privilege level of the calling code on Windows systems
  7. Created wez/govee-lan-hass - Control Govee lights via the LAN API from Home Assistant
  8. Created wez/govee-py - Control Govee Lights from Python
  9. Created wez/govee2mqtt - Govee2MQTT: Connect Govee lights and devices to Home Assistant
  10. Created wez/docker-stack-deploy - GitOps automation for plain old docker compose stack deploy
  11. Created wez/rmk - Rust keyboard firmware library with layers, macros, real-time keymap editing, wireless(BLE) and split support
  12. Created wez/lockbud - Statically detect memory, concurrency bugs and possible panic locations for Rust.
  13. Created wez/wiff - sniff out the wiff in your diff, from the comfort of your terminal. wiff is a terminal-centric code review tool
  14. Most recent push to wez/wiff

Compare

WEZ · 6DMEDIAN CODER

WEZ compared with MEDIAN CODER across six rating categoriesImpactConsistencyQualityDepthBreadthCommunity

Rubric

How this score was produced

Overall = Σ(category × weight) + deterministic top-end curve

CategoryWeightScoreContribution
Impact25%8220.50
Quality25%6917.25
Depth20%7615.20
Consistency15%7811.70
Breadth10%747.40
Community5%633.15
Impact · 82/100

What it measures. Project usefulness, ambition, originality, and coherence. Popularity is not impact.

Evidence for wez. Several owned projects appear practically useful and distinctive, spanning home automation, input remapping, media tooling, deployment, and systems utilities. Repository popularity is not used as the basis for this score.

Quality · 69/100

What it measures. Engineering and project-maturity signals supported by the available public metadata.

Evidence for wez. Metadata indicates multiple substantial, maintained owned projects and several mature-looking domains, but the available public metadata does not establish engineering quality.

Depth · 76/100

What it measures. Sustained ownership, meaningful scope, and continued maintenance rather than one-shots.

Evidence for wez. The portfolio includes long-lived owned projects with updates from 2022 through 2026, plus multiple projects that appear to address nontrivial practical problems. Exact scope and implementation depth are not available.

Consistency · 78/100

What it measures. Recency and contribution patterns across the supplied activity window.

Evidence for wez. The visible portfolio shows repeated activity through 2026, with multiple owned repositories updated across several years. The supplied subset supports sustained activity, though it does not provide complete contribution history or explain.

Breadth · 74/100

What it measures. Language entropy and project-type diversity across owned repos.

Evidence for wez. The visible repositories span Rust, C++, Python, Java, home automation, desktop/input tooling, media utilities, deployment, parsing, and systems-oriented projects. Forks are treated as limited evidence of owned breadth.

Community · 63/100

What it measures. A weak positive tie-breaker for supplied community signals, never a popularity penalty.

Evidence for wez. The profile has substantial followers and several repositories have visible stars, providing a weak positive signal of community attention. This category does not affect the other scores.

Raw total
75.20
Top-end curve
+0.00
Final overall
75.2

Tier thresholds

S 90-100 Mass-producing humansA 80-89 Ship machineB 70-79 Solid engineerC 60-69 Getting thereD 40-59 README enthusiastF 0-39 GitHub tourist

I. How this saved profile rating was produced

  1. 01

    Validate. The server validates the login, signed browser session, attempts, cooldown, daily ceiling, and the single provider permit.

  2. 02

    Collect. The VPS collector reads bounded public profile metadata and up to 12 recent repository metadata rows in volatile memory.

  3. 03

    Rate. One pinned provider returned a closed profile-rating object with no tools, browsing, shell, or repository-content access.

  4. 04

    Verify. Server checks bound the subject, rejected unsafe or echoed text, validated the schema, and recomputed rubric-v3 final arithmetic.

  5. 05

    Save. Only a valid completion and allowlisted post-completion facts commit atomically; the public projection is then rebuilt.

This saved profile analysis is metadata-only and did not read repository trees, README files, or source code. Availability of new analysis is separate from this historical result.

Rated 2026-08-10 · rating-rubric/3

II. Data sources & caveats
  • Scores summarize one accepted, subject-bound analysis; they are not a security audit or endorsement.
  • Rank, percentile, and median use 1095 currently accepted public profiles and can change as the leaderboard changes.
  • Repository and language details reflect the bounded analyzed sample, not necessarily every repository.
  • Missing data is shown as unavailable or not evaluated instead of being inferred as zero.
  • Analysis completed Aug 10, 2026, 2:17 AM UTC and is marked aging.